Cited by 185Coffee research and impactsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNutritional Studies and Diet

Habitual Coffee Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Open access
Mostofsky, Elizabeth, Rice, Megan S., Levitan, Emily B., Mittleman, Murray A.·2012·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background—: There have been discrepant findings on the association between coffee consumption and risk of incident heart failure. Methods and Results—: We conducted a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies that assessed the relationship between habitual coffee consumption and the risk of heart failure. We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) from January 1966 through December 2011, with the use of a standardized protocol. Eligible studies were prospective cohort studies that examined the association of coffee consumption with incident heart failure. Five independent prospective studies of coffee consumption and heart failure risk, including 6522 heart failure events and 140 220 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. We observed a statistically significant J-shaped relationship between coffee and heart failure. Compared with no consumption, the strongest inverse association was seen for 4 servings/day and a potentially higher risk at higher levels of consumption. There was no evidence that the relationship between coffee and heart failure risk varied by sex or by baseline history of myocardial infarction or diabetes. Conclusions—: Moderate coffee consumption is inversely associated with risk of heart failure, with the largest inverse association observed for consumption of 4 servings per day.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.112.967299

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 185

Authors
Mostofsky, E., Rice, M. S., Levitan, E. B., & Mittleman, M. A.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2012-07
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
401-405
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2107269509
Cited by
185
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32-HL098048-03, T32HL098048)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32-CA-09001-35, T32CA009001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
coffee consumption, heart failure, J-shaped association, dose-response relationship, incident heart failure risk, sex differences, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Coffee, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Nonlinear Dynamics, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review