Cited by 109Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Association between Use of Statins and Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure and Ejection Fraction of ≥50%

Alehagen, Urban, Benson, Lina, Edner, Magnus, Dahlström, Ulf, Lund, Lars H.·2015·Circulation Heart Failure

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is poorly understood, but may involve a systemic proinflammatory state. Therefore, statins might improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction defined as ≥50%. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 46 959 unique patients in the prospective Swedish Heart Failure Registry, 9140 patients had heart failure and ejection fraction ≥50% (age 77±11 years, 54.0% women), and of these, 3427 (37.5%) were treated with statins. Propensity scores for statin treatment were derived from 40 baseline variables. The association between statin use and primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary (separately, cardiovascular mortality, and combined all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization) end points was assessed with Cox regressions in a population matched 1:1 based on age and propensity score. In the matched population, 1-year survival was 85.1% for statin-treated versus 80.9% for untreated patients (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.89; P<0.001). Statins were also associated with reduced cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.98; P=0.026) and composite all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.96; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In heart failure with ejection fraction ≥50%, the use of statins was associated with improved outcomes. The mechanisms should be evaluated and the effects tested in a randomized trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.115.002143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 109

Authors
Alehagen, U., Benson, L., Edner, M., Dahlström, U., & Lund, L. H.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Circulation Heart Failure
Published
2015-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
862-870
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2176770752
Cited by
109
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
statins, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, proinflammatory state, propensity score matching, Swedish Heart Failure Registry
MeSH terms
Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Sweden, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review