Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 739

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Better Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) Registry

Dumas, Florence, Cariou, Alain, Manzo-Silberman, Stéphane, Grimaldi, David, Vivien, Benoît, Rosencher, Julien, Empana, Jean-Philippe, Carli, Pierre, Mira, Jean-Paul, Jouven, Xavier, Spaulding, Christian·2010·Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

Background—: Acute coronary occlusion is the leading cause of cardiac arrest. Because of limited data, the indications and timing of coronary angiography and angioplasty in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are controversial. Using data from the Parisian Region Out of hospital Cardiac ArresT prospective registry, we performed an analysis to assess the effect of an invasive strategy on hospital survival. Methods and Results—: Between January 2003 and December 2008, 714 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were referred to a tertiary center in Paris, France. In 435 patients with no obvious extracardiac cause of arrest, an immediate coronary angiogram was performed at admission followed, if indicated, by coronary angioplasty. At least 1 significant coronary artery lesion was found in 304 (70%) patients, in 128 (96%) of 134 patients with ST-segment elevation on the ECG performed after the return of spontaneous circulation, and in 176 (58%) of 301 patients without ST-segment elevation. The hospital survival rate was 40%. Multivariable analysis showed successful coronary angioplasty to be an independent predictive factor of survival, regardless of the postresuscitation ECG pattern (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.66). Conclusions—: Successful immediate coronary angioplasty is associated with improved hospital survival in patients with or without ST-segment elevation. Therefore, our findings support the use of immediate coronary angiography in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with no obvious noncardiac cause of arrest regardless of the ECG pattern.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circinterventions.109.913665

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 739

Metadata

Authors
Dumas, F., Cariou, A., Manzo-Silberman, S., Grimaldi, D., Vivien, B., Rosencher, J., Empana, J.-P., Carli, P., Mira, J.-P., Jouven, X., & Spaulding, C.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2010-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
200-207
ISSN
  • 1941-7632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7640
OpenAlex
W2157499406
Cited by
739
References
2
FWCI
44.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Better Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circinterventions.109.913665
The paper
Dumas, F., Cariou, A., Manzo-Silberman, S., Grimaldi, D., Vivien, B., Rosencher, J., Empana, J.-P., Carli, P., Mira, J.-P., Jouven, X., & Spaulding, C. (2010). Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Better Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) Registry. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.109.913665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.