Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraarterial Administration of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Randomized-Start, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial (PROVASA)

Walter, Dirk H., Krankenberg, Hans, Balzer, Jörn O., Kalka, Christoph, Baumgartner, Iris, Schlüter, Michael, Tonn, Torsten, Seeger, Florian, Dimmeler, Stefanie, Lindhoff-Last, Edelgard, Zeiher, Andreas M., for the PROVASA Investigators·2011·Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

Background—: Critical limb ischemia due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease is associated with a severely increased morbidity and mortality. There is no effective pharmacological therapy available. Injection of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) is a promising therapeutic option in patients with critical limb ischemia, but double-blind, randomized trials are lacking. Methods and Results—: Forty patients with critical limb ischemia were included in a multicenter, phase II, double-blind, randomized-start trial to receive either intraarterial administration of BM-MNC or placebo followed by active treatment with BM-MNC (open label) after 3 months. Intraarterial administration of BM-MNC did not significantly increase ankle-brachial index and, thus, the trial missed its primary end point. However, cell therapy was associated with significantly improved ulcer healing (ulcer area, 3.2±4.7 cm 2 to 1.89±3.5 cm 2 [ P =0.014] versus placebo, 2.92±3.5 cm 2 to 2.89±4.1 cm 2 [ P =0.5]) and reduced rest pain (5.2±1.8 to 2.2±1.3 [ P =0.009] versus placebo, 4.5±2.4 to 3.9±2.6 [ P =0.3]) within 3 months. Limb salvage and amputation-free survival rates did not differ between the groups. Repeated BM-MNC administration and higher BM-MNC numbers and functionality were the only independent predictors of improved ulcer healing. Ulcer healing induced by repeated BM-MNC administration significantly correlated with limb salvage ( r =0.8; P <0.001). Conclusions—: Intraarterial administration of BM-MNC is safe and feasible and accelerates wound healing in patients without extensive gangrene and impending amputation. These exploratory findings of this pilot trial need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial in patients with critical limb ischemia and stable ulcers. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00282646.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circinterventions.110.958348

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Walter, D. H., Krankenberg, H., Balzer, J. O., Kalka, C., Baumgartner, I., Schlüter, M., Tonn, T., Seeger, F., Dimmeler, S., Lindhoff-Last, E., Zeiher, A. M., & for the PROVASA Investigators
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2011-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
26-37
ISSN
  • 1941-7632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7640
OpenAlex
W2548903965
Cited by
249
References
2
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraarterial Administration of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Randomized-Start, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial (PROVASA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circinterventions.110.958348
The paper
Walter, D. H., Krankenberg, H., Balzer, J. O., Kalka, C., Baumgartner, I., Schlüter, M., Tonn, T., Seeger, F., Dimmeler, S., Lindhoff-Last, E., Zeiher, A. M., & for the PROVASA Investigators. (2011). Intraarterial Administration of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Randomized-Start, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial (PROVASA). Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.110.958348

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.