Cited by 137Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth and Medical Research ImpactsChronic Disease Management Strategies

The Cardiovascular Research Network: A New Paradigm for Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Research

Go, Alan S., Magid, David J., Wells, Barbara, Sung, Sue Hee, Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E., Greenlee, Robert T., Langer, Robert D., Lieu, Tracy A. +14 more·2008·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background— A clear need exists for a more systematic understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of cardiovascular diseases. More robust data are also needed on how well clinical trials are translated into contemporary community practice and the associated resource use, costs, and outcomes. Methods and Results— The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recently established the Cardiovascular Research Network, which represents a new paradigm to evaluate the epidemiology, quality of care, and outcomes of cardiovascular disease and to conduct future clinical trials using a community-based model. The network includes 15 geographically distributed health plans with dedicated research centers, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute representatives, and an external collaboration and advisory committee. Cardiovascular research network sites bring complementary content and methodological expertise and a diverse population of ≈11 million individuals treated through various health care delivery models. Each site’s rich electronic databases (eg, sociodemographic characteristics, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses and procedures, pharmacy, laboratory, and cost data) are being mapped to create a standardized virtual data warehouse to facilitate rapid and efficient large-scale research studies. Initial projects focus on (1) hypertension recognition and management, (2) quality and outcomes of warfarin therapy, and (3) use, outcomes, and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Conclusions— The Cardiovascular Research Network represents a new paradigm in the approach to cardiovascular quality of care and outcomes research among community-based populations. Its unique ability to characterize longitudinally large, diverse populations will yield novel insights into contemporary disease and risk factor surveillance, management, outcomes, and costs. The Cardiovascular Research Network aims to become the national research partner of choice for efforts to improve the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of cardiovascular diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.108.801654

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 137

Authors
Go, A. S., Magid, D. J., Wells, B., Sung, S. H., Cassidy-Bushrow, A. E., Greenlee, R. T., Langer, R. D., Lieu, T. A., Margolis, K. L., Masoudi, F. A., McNeal, C. J., Murata, G. H., Newton, K. M., Novotny, R., Reynolds, K., Roblin, D. W., Smith, D. H., Vupputuri, S., White, R. E., Olson, J., Rumsfeld, J. S., & Gurwitz, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • From Kaiser Permanente Northern California (A.S.G., S.H.S.), University of California, San Francisco, Calif; Kaiser Permanente Colorado (D.J.M., F.A.M., J.S.R.), University of Colorado, Denver, Colo; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (B.W., J.O.), Bethesda, Md; Henry Ford Health System (A.C-B.), Detroit, Mich; Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation (R.T.G.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Geisinger Health System (R.D.L.), Danville, Penn; Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention,...
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2008-11
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
138-147
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W1986087095
Cited by
137
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U19 HL91179-01, U19HL091179)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, cardiovascular disease epidemiology, quality of care, clinical outcomes research, health plans, virtual data warehouse, electronic health records, antihypertensive therapy, warfarin anticoagulation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, health care costs
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Community Health Services, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Research, United States, Warfarin, Databases, Factual, Defibrillators, Implantable, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review