Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification Is Associated With Improved Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Open access
Lin, Cheryl B., Peterson, Eric D., Smith, Eric E., Saver, Jeffrey L., Liang, Li, Xian, Ying, Olson, DaiWai M., Shah, Bimal R., Hernandez, Adrian F., Schwamm, Lee H., Fonarow, Gregg C.·2012·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background—: The benefits of intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent. Emergency medical services (EMS) hospital prenotification of an incoming patient with potential stroke may provide a means of reducing evaluation and treatment times and improving treatment rates; yet, available data are limited. Methods and Results—: We examined 371 988 patients with acute ischemic stroke transported by EMS and enrolled in Get With The Guidelines–Stroke from April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2011. Prenotification occurred in 249 197 (67.0%) of EMS-transported patients. Among eligible patients arriving by 2 hours, patients with EMS prenotification were more likely to be treated with tPA within 3 hours (82.8% versus 79.2%, absolute difference +3.5%, P <0.0001, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-documented cohort; 73.0% versus 64.0%, absolute difference +9.0%, P <0.0001, overall cohort). Patients with EMS prenotification had shorter door-to–imaging times (26 minutes versus 31 minutes, P <0.0001), shorter door-to–needle times (78 minutes versus 80 minutes, P <0.0001), and shorter symptom onset-to–needle times (141 minutes versus 145 minutes, P <0.0001). In multivariable and modified Poisson regression analyses accounting for the clustering of patients within hospitals, use of EMS prenotification was independently associated with greater likelihood of door-to–imaging times ≤25 minutes, door-to–needle times for tPA ≤60 minutes, onset-to–needle times ≤120 minutes, and tPA use within 3 hours. Conclusions—: EMS hospital prenotification is associated with improved evaluation, timelier stroke treatment, and more eligible patients treated with tPA. These results support the need for initiatives targeted at increasing EMS prenotification rates as a mechanism from improving quality of care and outcomes in stroke.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965210

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Lin, C. B., Peterson, E. D., Smith, E. E., Saver, J. L., Liang, L., Xian, Y., Olson, D. M., Shah, B. R., Hernandez, A. F., Schwamm, L. H., & Fonarow, G. C.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2012-07
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
514-522
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2105004565
Cited by
254
References
1
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification Is Associated With Improved Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965210
The paper
Lin, C. B., Peterson, E. D., Smith, E. E., Saver, J. L., Liang, L., Xian, Y., Olson, D. M., Shah, B. R., Hernandez, A. F., Schwamm, L. H., & Fonarow, G. C. (2012). Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification Is Associated With Improved Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.