Cited by 246Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Patient Outcomes: Results From the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF)

Freeman, James V., Simon, DaJuanicia N., Go, Alan S., Spertus, John, Fonarow, Gregg C., Gersh, Bernard J., Hylek, Elaine M., Kowey, Peter R. +5 more·2015·Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instruments to assess symptom burden and quality of life among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been well evaluated in community practice or associated with patient outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from 10 087 AF patients in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of AF (ORBIT-AF), symptom severity was evaluated using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) classification system, and quality of life was assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire. The association between AF-related symptoms, quality of life, and outcomes was assessed using Cox regression. The majority of AF patients (61.8%) were symptomatic (EHRA >2) and 16.5% had severe or disabling symptoms (EHRA 3-4). EHRA symptom class was well correlated with the AFEQT score (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.39). Over 1.8 years of follow-up, AF symptoms were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio for EHRA ≥2 versus EHRA 1 1.23, 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.31) and a borderline higher risk of major bleeding. Lower quality of life was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio for lowest quartile of AFEQT versus highest 1.49, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.84), but not other major adverse events, including death. CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based study, most patients with AF were symptomatic and had impaired quality of life. Quality of life measured by the AFEQT correlated closely with symptom severity measured by the EHRA class. AF symptoms and lower quality of life were associated with higher risk of hospitalization but not mortality during follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001303

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 246

Authors
Freeman, J. V., Simon, D. N., Go, A. S., Spertus, J., Fonarow, G. C., Gersh, B. J., Hylek, E. M., Kowey, P. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Thomas, L. E., Chang, P., Peterson, E. D., & Piccini, J. P.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2015-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
393-402
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W1938322412
Cited by
246
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, symptom burden, quality of life, hospitalization, major bleeding, mortality, patient outcomes, community-based patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Outpatients, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review