Cited by 20Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Residual Angina After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Grodzinsky, Anna, Kosiborod, Mikhail, Tang, Fengming, Jones, Philip G., McGuire, Darren K., Spertus, John A., Beltrame, John F., Jang, Jae-Sik +4 more·2017·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background—: Previous studies suggest that among patients with stable coronary artery disease, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have less angina and more silent ischemia when compared with those without DM. However, the burden of angina in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been recently examined. Methods and Results—: In a 10-site US PCI registry, we assessed angina before and at 1, 6, and 12 months after elective PCI with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score (range, 0–100, higher=better). We also examined the rates of antianginal medication prescriptions at discharge. A multivariable, repeated-measures Poisson model was used to examine the independent association of DM with angina over the year after treatment. Among 1080 elective PCI patients (mean age, 65 years; 74.7% men), 34.0% had DM. At baseline and at each follow-up, patients with DM had similar angina prevalence and severity as those without DM. Patients with DM were more commonly prescribed calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates at discharge (DM versus not: 27.9% versus 20.9% [ P =0.01] and 32.8% versus 25.5% [ P =0.01], respectively), whereas β-blockers and ranolazine were prescribed at similar rates. In the multivariable, repeated-measures model, the risk of angina was similar over the year after PCI in patients with versus without DM (relative risk, 1.04; range, 0.80–1.36). Conclusions—: Patients with stable coronary artery disease and DM exhibit a burden of angina that is at least as high as those without DM despite more antianginal prescriptions at discharge. These findings contradict the conventional teachings that patients with DM experience less angina because of silent ischemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003553

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grodzinsky, A., Kosiborod, M., Tang, F., Jones, P. G., McGuire, D. K., Spertus, J. A., Beltrame, J. F., Jang, J.-S., Goyal, A., Butala, N. M., Yeh, R. W., & Arnold, S. V.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2017-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2754335765
Cited by
20
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL096624, T32HL110837)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, percutaneous coronary intervention, stable coronary artery disease, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, antianginal drugs, calcium channel blockers, long-acting nitrates, beta-blockers, ranolazine, silent myocardial ischemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina Pectoris, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Readmission, Postoperative Period, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Elective Surgical Procedures, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review