The DOI matches its Crossref record.
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample
Open accessAbstract
The use of large administrative databases is transforming clinical cardiovascular research. These sources of big data allow the study of practices and outcomes across a spectrum of health systems, providing real-world evidence. However, these databases have peculiarities to their design that require specialized expertise and distinct analytic practices for their appropriate interpretation. We discuss these issues in the context of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) that is one such data set used in healthcare research. Compiled by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality annually since 1988, it comprises a large number of inpatient discharges from US community hospitals regardless of the payer (≈8 million/y), with each observation representing a unique hospitalization.1 It has some features to its design and the content of its data that are essential to consider in the pursuit of studies with it. The NIS includes information on patient demographics, administrative codes for primary diagnosis and secondary diagnoses, procedures, survival to discharge, disposition, hospital charges, and length of stay.1 The NIS can be used to examine the use of hospital health services, practice variation, cost, and the impact of health policy interventions in the inpatient setting.1 The data are easily accessible, inexpensive, and can be analyzed using ubiquitous statistical programs. Consequently, research publications from the NIS data have grown rapidly in recent years (Figure 1). Nevertheless, researchers, as well as scientific journals and their readers, may not yet be familiar with the nuances of this complex data set and therefore be challenged to determine if the data are interpreted correctly. Figure 1. Calendar year trends in publications from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Number of peer-reviewed publications from the NIS have increased rapidly in recent years. Data from other Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) data sets are presented for comparison—Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) and …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample
Khera, R., Angraal, S., Couch, T., Welsh, J. W., Nallamothu, B. K., Girotra, S., Chan, P. S., & Krumholz, H. M. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17653 · Cited by 689
Self-citationMazi, P. B., Olsen, M. A., Stwalley, D., Rauseo, A. M., Ayres, C., Powderly, W. G., & Spec, A. (2022) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciac004 · Cited by 68
Hafezi-Nejad, N., Bailey, C. R., Solomon, A. J., Abou Areda, M., Carrino, J. A., Khan, M., & Weiss, C. R. (2021) · Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016733 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Khera, R., & Krumholz, H. M.
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7713
- OpenAlex
- W2734820842
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003846
- The paper
- Khera, R., & Krumholz, H. M. (2017). With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.