Novel Care Pathway for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
The annual cost of care for atrial fibrillation (AF) is estimated to be $6.65 billion, with nearly three fourth of costs because of hospitalizations 1 and 70% of admissions present through the emergency department (ED). 2 In an international survey of routine ED AF management from Canada, United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, there were striking differences in ED use of rate control or rhythm control interventions and the likelihood of discharge.3 For example, in Canada, the vast majority of patients with AF in the ED are pharmacologically or electrically cardioverted without cardiology supervision.In the United States, the majority of patients are admitted for further management.Several small US studies have evaluated the use of an ED observation unit with a protocol for pharmacological or direct current cardioversion in selected patients.4 However, these studies often rely on specialist consultation in the ED and do not rely heavily on outpatient care coordination, which are critical for improving quality of care.In 2011, the Center for Innovation in Complex Care assessed gaps in care for patients presenting to the health system with AF; identified gaps included a lack of standardization, integration, and information access across the various providers-including ED centers, cardiologists, primary care specialists, nurses, and pharmacists-who comanage AF patients.5 To address some of these problems in AF management, the goal of this innovation was to introduce a structured process for AF care, linking the expertise of ED and cardiology practices with the introduction of clinical pharmacists to bridge the gap and coordinate treatment, to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions while improving access to comprehensive AF care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach of using principal diagnosis to identify AF-specific health care encounters has been validated in prior studies and found to be highly accurate.
“This approach has been validated in prior studies and has been found to be highly accurate at identifying health care encounters specific to AF.”
From Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
The 'Success of the Initiative' section uses a primary ED diagnosis of AF to define the encounters studied, but does not assess whether that method accurately identifies AF-specific encounters. Searches for validation, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity found no passage reporting prior validation or high accuracy. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Gehi, A. K., Deyo, Z., Mendys, P., Hatfield, L., Laux, J., Walker, T. J., Chen, S., O’Bryan, J., Garner, K., Sears, S. F., Akiyama, J., Stearns, S. C., & Biese, K.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.G., P.M., T.J.W., S.C., J.O., K.G.), University of North Carolina Medical Center (Z.D., L.H.), Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy (Z.D., P.M., L.H.), Gillings School of Global Public Health (J.L., J.A., S.S.), and Department of Emergency Medicine (K.B.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Department of Psychology (S.S.), Department of Cardiovascular...
- ORCID
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e004129-e004129
- ISSN
- 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7713
- OpenAlex
- W2783715961
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Scholarship East Carolina University's Institutional Repository (East Carolina University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, emergency department, care pathways, emergency department care, stroke prevention, anticoagulation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Patient Admission, Patient Care Team, Pharmacists, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Cardiology Service, Hospital, Program Development, Treatment Outcome, Efficiency, Organizational, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Critical Pathways, Professional Role, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review