Cited by 85Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Adapting and evaluating a health system intervention from Kaiser Permanente to improve hypertension management and control in a large network of safety-net clinics

Open access
Fontil, Valy, Gupta, Reena, Moise, Nathalie, Chen, Ellen, Guzman, David, McCulloch, Charles E., Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten·2018·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Nearly half of Americans with diagnosed hypertension have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while some integrated healthcare systems, such as Kaiser Permanente Northern California, have achieved control rates upwards 90%. Methods and Results: We adapted Kaiser Permanente’s evidence-based treatment protocols in a racially and ethnically diverse population at 12 safety-net clinics in the San Francisco Health Network. The intervention consisted of 4 elements: a hypertension registry, a simplified treatment intensification protocol that included fixed-dose combination medications containing diuretics, standardized BP measurement protocol, and BP check visits led by registered nurse and pharmacist staff. The study population comprised patients with hypertension who made ≥1 primary care visits within the past 24 months (n=15 917) and had a recorded BP measurement within the past 12 months. We conducted a postintervention time series analysis from August 2014 to August 2016 to assess the effect of the intervention on BP control for 24 months for the pilot site and for 15 months for 11 other San Francisco Health Network clinics combined. Secondary outcomes were changes in use of guideline-recommended medication prescribing. Rates of BP control increased at the pilot site (68%–74%; P <0.01) and the 11 other San Francisco Health Network clinic sites (69%–74%; P <0.01). Statistically significant improvements in BP control rates ( P <0.01) at the 11 San Francisco Health Network clinic sites occurred in all racial and ethnic groups (blacks, 60%–66%; whites, 69%–75%; Latinos, 67%–72%; Asians, 78%–82%). Use of fixed-dose combination medications increased from 10% to 13% ( P <0.01), and the percentage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescriptions dispensed in combination with a thiazide diuretic increased from 36% to 40% ( P <0.01). Conclusions: Evidence-based system approaches to improving BP control can be implemented in safety-net settings and could play a pivotal role in achieving improved population BP control and reducing hypertension disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.117.004386

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown that addressing the barriers to standardized blood pressure measurement can dramatically improve the quality of clinic blood pressure measurements.

    “However, studies have also shown that addressing these barriers can dramatically improve the quality of clinic BP measurements.32–36”

    From International Consensus on Standardized Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement – A Call to Action (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Methods (Measurements and outcomes; page unavailable) describe automated clinic BP measurements and instructions to repeat elevated readings, but say adherence to that protocol was not assessed. The Results report improved BP control, not improved measurement quality. Searches for standardized measurement, measurement accuracy, and barriers to measurement found no passage establishing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 85

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]AHRQ. Expenditures for Hypertension among Adults Age 18 and Older, 2010: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population. 2013; 2016. 30188652
  2. [8]Fontil V, Bibbins-Domingo K, Nguyen OK, Guzman D and Goldman LE. Management of Hypertension in Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics in the United States: A Comparison of Community Health Centers and Private Physicians’ Offices. Health Serv Res. 2017; 52: 807– 825. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12516 27283354 PMC5346492 · DOI

Authors
Fontil, V., Gupta, R., Moise, N., Chen, E., Guzman, D., McCulloch, C. E., & Bibbins-Domingo, K.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • San Francisco Department of Public Health (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2018-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e004386-e004386
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2813469675
Cited by
85
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL136899)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK103992)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS081760)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure control, safety-net clinics, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, hypertension registry, racial and ethnic disparities, intervention adaptation, integrated health system
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Drug Combinations, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Health Systems Plans, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Patient Care Team, Pharmacists, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Registries, San Francisco, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult, Safety-net Providers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review