Cited by 80Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Compounding Benefits of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy for the Reduction of Major Cardiovascular Events: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wang, Nelson, Woodward, Mark, Huffman, Mark D., Rodgers, Anthony·2022·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background Mendelian randomization studies use genetic variants as natural experiments to provide evidence about causal relations between modifiable risk factors and disease. Recent Mendelian randomization studies suggest each mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) sustained over a lifetime can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by more than half. However, these findings have not been replicated in randomized clinical trials, and the effect of treatment duration on the magnitude of risk reduction remains uncertain. The aim of this article was to evaluate the relationship between lipid-lowering drug exposure time and relative risk reduction of major cardiovascular events in randomized clinical trials. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors that report LDL-C levels and effect sizes for each year of follow-up. The primary end point was major vascular events, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. Hazard ratios during each year of follow-up were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Results A total of 21 trials with 184 012 patients and an average mean follow-up of 4.4 years were included. Meta-regression showed there was greater relative risk reduction in major vascular events with increasing duration of treatment ( P Conclusions The bene…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008552

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 80

Authors
Wang, N., Woodward, M., Huffman, M. D., & Rodgers, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2022-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
e008552-e008552
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W4224124776
Cited by
80
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
LDL cholesterol lowering, lipid-lowering therapy, statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, major vascular events, cardiovascular risk reduction, treatment duration, relative risk reduction, Mendelian randomization, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review