Cited by 209Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and SplicingSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Analysis of Transcriptome Complexity Through RNA Sequencing in Normal and Failing Murine Hearts

Open access
Lee, Jae-Hyung, Gao, Chen, Peng, Guangdun, Greer, Christopher, Ren, Shuxun, Wang, Yibin, Xiao, Xinshu·2011·Circulation Research

Abstract

Rationale: Accurate and comprehensive de novo transcriptome profiling in heart is a central issue to better understand cardiac physiology and diseases. Although significant progress has been made in genome-wide profiling for quantitative changes in cardiac gene expression, current knowledge offers limited insights to the total complexity in cardiac transcriptome at individual exon level. Objective: To develop more robust bioinformatic approaches to analyze high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, with the focus on the investigation of transcriptome complexity at individual exon and transcript levels. Methods and Results: In addition to overall gene expression analysis, the methods developed in this study were used to analyze RNA-Seq data with respect to individual transcript isoforms, novel spliced exons, novel alternative terminal exons, novel transcript clusters (ie, novel genes), and long noncoding RNA genes. We applied these approaches to RNA-Seq data obtained from mouse hearts after pressure-overload–induced by transaortic constriction. Based on experimental validations, analyses of the features of the identified exons/transcripts, and expression analyses including previously published RNA-Seq data, we demonstrate that the methods are highly effective in detecting and quantifying individual exons and transcripts. Novel insights inferred from the examined aspects of the cardiac transcriptome open ways to further experimental investigations. Conclusions: Our work provided a comprehensive set of methods to analyze mouse cardiac transcriptome complexity at individual exon and transcript levels. Applications of the methods may infer important new insights to gene regulation in normal and disease hearts in terms of exon utilization and potential involvement of novel components of cardiac transcriptome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.111.249433

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An RNA-seq-based co-expression study on normal and failing murine hearts found that many lincRNAs are present in clusters correlating with the failing murine heart phenotype, suggesting a possible role of these non-coding RNAs in this disease.

    “An RNA-seq-based co-expression study on normal and failing murine hearts found that many lincRNAs are present in clusters correlating with the failing murine heart phenotype, suggesting a possible role of these non-coding RNAs in this disease [67].”

    From Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions (2017) · cites this paper as [67]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • WGCNA was the first co-expression tool to be applied to RNA-seq data; it has effectively identified biologically relevant associations between phenotypes and modules, performing similarly to microarray-based analyses.

    “WGCNA was the first co-expression tool to be applied to RNA-seq data; it has effectively identified biologically relevant associations between phenotypes and modules [19, 66, 67], performing similarly to microarray-based analyses.”

    From Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions (2017) · cites this paper as [67]

    In Results, “Inference of potential function of novel transcript clusters” (page unavailable), the authors report applying WGCNA to RNA-seq data and finding modules enriched for genes differentially expressed between diseased and sham hearts, with associations to heart- and muscle-related functions. They describe these functional indications as tentative. The paper does not establish that WGCNA was the first co-expression tool applied to RNA-seq data or compare its performance with microarray-based analyses. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 209

Authors
Lee, J.-H., Gao, C., Peng, G., Greer, C., Ren, S., Wang, Y., & Xiao, X.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2011-12-09
Volume
109
Issue
12
Pages
1332-1341
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2171405631
Cited by
209
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000124)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL070079, HL070079, R01HL088640, HL-098954, R01HL098954, HL-088640, HL-103205, R01HL103205)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA027039)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006264)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
cardiac transcriptome, transcriptome complexity, mRNA isoforms, long non-coding RNA, heart failure, pressure overload, transverse aortic constriction, mouse heart, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, Heart, Heart Failure, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review