Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Potential Oligogenic Etiology of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Classic Single-Gene Disorder

Li, Lili, Bainbridge, Matthew Neil, Tan, Yanli, Willerson, James T., Marian, Ali J.·2017·Circulation Research

Abstract

Rationale: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a prototypic single-gene disease caused mainly by mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins. Despite the remarkable advances, the causal genes in ≈40% of the HCM cases remain unknown, typically in small families and sporadic cases, wherein cosegregation could not be established. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the missing causal genes in HCM is, in part, because of an oligogenic cause, wherein the pathogenic variants do not cosegregate with the phenotype. Methods and Results: A clinically affected trio with HCM underwent clinical evaluation, electrocardiography, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and whole exome sequencing. Pathogenic variants in the whole exome sequencing data were identified using established algorithms. Family members were genotyped by Sanger sequencing and cosegregation was analyzed. The siblings had a severe course, whereas the mother had a mild course. Variant analysis showed that the trio shared 145 heterozygous pathogenic variants in 139 genes, including 2 in cardiomyopathy genes TTN and ALPK3 . The siblings also had the pathogenic variant p.Ala13Thr variant in MYL2 , a known gene for HCM. The sibling’s father also carried the p.Ala13Thr variant, in whom an unambiguous diagnosis of HCM could not be made because of concomitant severe aortic stenosis. The TTN variant segregated with HCM, except in a 7-year-old boy, who had a normal phenotype. The ALPK3 variant, shared by the affected trio, did not segregate with the phenotype. Conclusions: We posit that a subset of HCM might be oligogenic caused by multiple pathogenic variants that do not perfectly cosegregate with the phenotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.116.310559

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.140 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308830 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/gim.2016.90 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.236067 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/jmg.2005.033886 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jmg.2005.040329 · DOI
  7. 10.1152/ajpheart.00637.2013 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.009 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.062 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/ng0596-63 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.093 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/ng.3036 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.2014.14601 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/jnci/dju384 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010134 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/339621 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0509937103 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, L., Bainbridge, M. N., Tan, Y., Willerson, J. T., & Marian, A. J.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2017-03-31
Volume
120
Issue
7
Pages
1084-1090
ISSN
  • 0009-7330
  • 1524-4571
Cited by
61
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review