Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Open access
Kucher, Nils, Goldhaber, Samuel Z.·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background—Acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) carries an exceptionally high mortality rate. We explored how often adjunctive therapies, particularly thrombolysis and inferior vena caval (IVC) filter placement, were performed and how these therapies affected the clinical outcome of patients with massive PE. Methods and Results—Among 2392 patients with acute PE and known systolic arterial blood pressure at presentation, from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER), 108 (4.5%) had massive PE, defined as a systolic arterial pressure 90 mm Hg, and 2284 (95.5%) had non–massive PE with a systolic arterial pressure 90 mm Hg. PE was first diagnosed at autopsy in 16 patients (15%) with massive PE and in 29 patients (1%) with non–massive PE (P0.001). The 90-day mortality rates were 52.4 % (95 % CI, 43.3 % to 62.1%) and 14.7 % (95 % CI, 13.3 % to 16.2%), respectively. In-hospital bleeding complications occurred in 17.6 % versus 9.7 % and recurrent PE within 90 days in 12.6 % and 7.6%, respectively (P0.001). In patients with massive PE, thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or catheter embolectomy were withheld in 73 (68%). Thrombolysis was performed in 33 patients, surgical embolectomy in 3, and catheter embolectomy in 1. Thrombolytic therapy did not reduce 90-day mortality (thrombolysis, 46.3%; 95 % CI, 31.0 % to 64.8%; no thrombolysis, 55.1%; 95 % CI, 44.3 % to 66.7%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.44 to 1.43). Recurrent PE rates at 90 days were similar in patients with and without thrombolytic therapy (12 % for both; P0.99). None of the 11 patients who received an IVC filter developed recurrent PE within 90 days, and 10 (90.9%)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.551374

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Kucher, N., & Goldhaber, S. Z.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-07-12
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
e28-32
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2058411733
Cited by
300
References
23
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.551374
The paper
Kucher, N., & Goldhaber, S. Z. (2005). Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.551374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.