The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study
Open accessAbstract
Background— We sought to investigate the use of a new parameter, the projected effective orifice area (EOA proj ) at normal transvalvular flow rate (250 mL/s), to better differentiate between truly severe (TS) and pseudo-severe (PS) aortic stenosis (AS) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Changes in various parameters of stenosis severity have been used to differentiate between TS and PS AS during DSE. However, the magnitude of these changes lacks standardization because they are dependent on the variable magnitude of the transvalvular flow change occurring during DSE. Methods and Results— The use of EOA proj to differentiate TS from PS AS was investigated in an in vitro model and in 23 patients with low-flow AS (indexed EOA <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) undergoing DSE and subsequent aortic valve replacement. For an individual valve, EOA was plotted against transvalvular flow (Q) at each dobutamine stage, and valve compliance (VC) was derived as the slope of the regression line fitted to the EOA versus Q plot; EOA proj was calculated as EOA proj =EOA rest +VC×(250−Q rest ), where EOA rest and Q rest are the EOA and Q at rest. Classification between TS and PS was based on either response to flow increase (in vitro) or visual inspection at surgery (in vivo). EOA proj was the most accurate parameter in differentiating between TS and PS both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 15 of 23 patients (65%) had TS and 8 of 23 (35%) had PS. The percentage of correct classification was 83% for EOA proj and 91% for indexed EOA proj compared with percentages of 61% to 74% for the other echocardiographic parameters usually used for this purpose. Conclusions— EOA proj provides a standardized evaluation of AS severity with DSE and improves the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TS and PS AS in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monin, J.-L., Quéré, J.-P., Monchi, M., Petit, H., Baleynaud, S., Chauvel, C., Pop, C., Ohlmann, P., Lelguen, C., Dehant, P., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000079171.43055.46 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Otto, C. M., Nishimura, R. A., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Gentile, F., Jneid, H., Krieger, E. V., Mack, M., McLeod, C., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000923 · Cited by 3,686
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536 · Cited by 3,523
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000029 · Cited by 2,566
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014 · Cited by 989
Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice
Baumgartner, H., Hung, J., Bermejo, J., Chambers, J. B., Evangelista, A., Griffin, B. P., Iung, B., Otto, C. M., Pellikka, P. A., & Quinones, M. (2009) · European Journal of Echocardiography · doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen303 · Cited by 967
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blais, C., Burwash, I. G., Mundigler, G., Dumesnil, J. G., Loho, N., Rader, F., Baumgartner, H., Beanlands, R. S., Chayer, B., Kadem, L., Garcia, D., Durand, L.-G., & Pibarot, P.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2006-02-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 711-721
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2105017592
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.557678
- The paper
- Blais, C., Burwash, I. G., Mundigler, G., Dumesnil, J. G., Loho, N., Rader, F., Baumgartner, H., Beanlands, R. S., Chayer, B., Kadem, L., Garcia, D., Durand, L.-G., & Pibarot, P. (2006). Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.557678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.