Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study

Open access
Blais, Claudia, Burwash, Ian G., Mundigler, Gerald, Dumesnil, Jean G., Loho, Nicole, Rader, Florian, Baumgartner, Helmut, Beanlands, Rob S., Chayer, Boris, Kadem, Lyes, Garcia, Damien, Durand, Louis-Gilles, Pibarot, Philippe·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— We sought to investigate the use of a new parameter, the projected effective orifice area (EOA proj ) at normal transvalvular flow rate (250 mL/s), to better differentiate between truly severe (TS) and pseudo-severe (PS) aortic stenosis (AS) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Changes in various parameters of stenosis severity have been used to differentiate between TS and PS AS during DSE. However, the magnitude of these changes lacks standardization because they are dependent on the variable magnitude of the transvalvular flow change occurring during DSE. Methods and Results— The use of EOA proj to differentiate TS from PS AS was investigated in an in vitro model and in 23 patients with low-flow AS (indexed EOA <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) undergoing DSE and subsequent aortic valve replacement. For an individual valve, EOA was plotted against transvalvular flow (Q) at each dobutamine stage, and valve compliance (VC) was derived as the slope of the regression line fitted to the EOA versus Q plot; EOA proj was calculated as EOA proj =EOA rest +VC×(250−Q rest ), where EOA rest and Q rest are the EOA and Q at rest. Classification between TS and PS was based on either response to flow increase (in vitro) or visual inspection at surgery (in vivo). EOA proj was the most accurate parameter in differentiating between TS and PS both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 15 of 23 patients (65%) had TS and 8 of 23 (35%) had PS. The percentage of correct classification was 83% for EOA proj and 91% for indexed EOA proj compared with percentages of 61% to 74% for the other echocardiographic parameters usually used for this purpose. Conclusions— EOA proj provides a standardized evaluation of AS severity with DSE and improves the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TS and PS AS in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.557678

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Blais, C., Burwash, I. G., Mundigler, G., Dumesnil, J. G., Loho, N., Rader, F., Baumgartner, H., Beanlands, R. S., Chayer, B., Kadem, L., Garcia, D., Durand, L.-G., & Pibarot, P.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-02-07
Volume
113
Issue
5
Pages
711-721
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2105017592
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.557678
The paper
Blais, C., Burwash, I. G., Mundigler, G., Dumesnil, J. G., Loho, N., Rader, F., Baumgartner, H., Beanlands, R. S., Chayer, B., Kadem, L., Garcia, D., Durand, L.-G., & Pibarot, P. (2006). Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.557678

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.