The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atherosclerotic Lesion Size and Vulnerability Are Determined by Patterns of Fluid Shear Stress
Open accessAbstract
Background— Atherosclerotic lesions are predominantly observed in curved arteries and near side branches, where low or oscillatory shear stress patterns occur, suggesting a causal connection. However, the effect of shear stress on plaque vulnerability is unknown because the lack of an appropriate in vivo model precludes cause-effect studies. Methods and Results— We developed a perivascular shear stress modifier that induces regions of lowered, increased, and lowered/oscillatory (ie, with vortices) shear stresses in mouse carotid arteries and studied plaque formation and composition. Atherosclerotic lesions developed invariably in the regions with lowered shear stress or vortices, whereas the regions of increased shear stress were protected. Lowered shear stress lesions were larger (intima/media, 1.38±0.68 versus 0.22±0.04); contained fewer smooth muscle cells (1.9±1.6% versus 26.3±9.7%), less collagen (15.3±1.0% versus 22.2±1.0%), and more lipids (15.8±0.9% versus 10.2±0.5%); and showed more outward vascular remodeling (214±19% versus 117±9%) than did oscillatory shear stress lesions. Expression of proatherogenic inflammatory mediators and matrix metalloproteinase activity was higher in the lowered shear stress regions. Spontaneous and angiotensin II–induced intraplaque hemorrhages occurred in the lowered shear stress regions only. Conclusions— Lowered shear stress and oscillatory shear stress are both essential conditions in plaque formation. Lowered shear stress induces larger lesions with a vulnerable plaque phenotype, whereas vortices with oscillatory shear stress induce stable lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von der Thüsen, J. H., van Vlijmen, B. J. M., Hoeben, R. C., Kockx, M. M., Havekes, L. M., van Berkel, T. J. C., & Biessen, E. A. L. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000015502.97828.93 · Cited by 203
Hilfiker, A., Hilfiker-Kleiner, D., Fuchs, M., Kaminski, K., Lichtenberg, A., Rothkötter, H.-J., Schieffer, B., & Drexler, H. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000021426.87274.62 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture
Bentzon, J. F., Otsuka, F., Virmani, R., & Falk, E. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.302721 · Cited by 2,391
Chiu, J.-J., & Chien, S. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00047.2009 · Cited by 2,280
Roles of vascular oxidative stress and nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis
Förstermann, U., Xia, N., & Li, H. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.116.309326 · Cited by 1,519
Chatzizisis, Y. S., Coskun, A. U., Jonas, M., Edelman, E. R., Feldman, C. L., & Stone, P. H. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059 · Cited by 1,483
Jaalouk, D. E., & Lammerding, J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2597 · Cited by 1,396
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, C., Tempel, D., van Haperen, R., van der Baan, A., Grosveld, F., Daemen, M. J. A. P., Krams, R., & de Crom, R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2006-06-13
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2744-2753
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1990752520
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atherosclerotic Lesion Size and Vulnerability Are Determined by Patterns of Fluid Shear Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.590018
- The paper
- Cheng, C., Tempel, D., van Haperen, R., van der Baan, A., Grosveld, F., Daemen, M. J. A. P., Krams, R., & de Crom, R. (2006). Atherosclerotic Lesion Size and Vulnerability Are Determined by Patterns of Fluid Shear Stress. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.590018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.