Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems

Bradley, Elizabeth H., Curry, Leslie A., Webster, Tashonna R., Mattera, Jennifer A., Roumanis, Sarah A., Radford, Martha J., McNamara, Robert L., Barton, Barbara A., Berg, David N., Krumholz, Harlan M.·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Fewer than half of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated within guideline-recommended door-to-balloon times; however, little information is available about the approaches used by hospitals that have been successful in improving door-to-balloon times to meet guidelines. We sought to characterize experiences of hospitals with outstanding improvement in door-to-balloon time during 1999–2002. Methods and Results— We performed a qualitative study using in-depth interviews (n=122) with clinical and administrative staff at 11 hospitals that were participating with the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction and had median door-to-balloon times of ≤90 minutes during 2001–2002, representing substantial improvement since 1999. Data were organized with the use of NUD-IST 4 (Sage Publications Software) and were analyzed by the constant comparative method of qualitative data analysis. Eight themes characterized hospitals’ experiences: commitment to an explicit goal to improve door-to-balloon time motivated by internal and external pressures; senior management support; innovative protocols; flexibility in refining standardized protocols; uncompromising individual clinical leaders; collaborative teams; data feedback to monitor progress and identify problems and successes; and an organizational culture that fostered resilience to challenges or setbacks in improvement efforts. Conclusions— Several themes characterized the experiences of hospitals that had achieved notable improvements in their door-to-balloon times. By distilling the complex and diverse experiences of organizational change into its essential components, this study provides a foundation for future efforts to elevate clinical performance in the hospital setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.590133

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., Webster, T. R., Mattera, J. A., Roumanis, S. A., Radford, M. J., McNamara, R. L., Barton, B. A., Berg, D. N., & Krumholz, H. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-02-28
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
1079-1085
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2111572130
Cited by
279
References
5
FWCI
51.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.590133
The paper
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., Webster, T. R., Mattera, J. A., Roumanis, S. A., Radford, M. J., McNamara, R. L., Barton, B. A., Berg, D. N., & Krumholz, H. M. (2006). Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.590133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.