The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery Lesions: Clinical and Angiographic Results of the ENDEAVOR II Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background— The use of the Endeavor stent might reduce restenosis and stent thrombosis at 9 months. Methods and Results— Patients (n=1197) treated for single coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study and randomly assigned to receive the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine polymer–coated stent (n=598) or the same bare metal stent but without the drug or the polymer coating (n=599). The 2 groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Diabetes was present in 20.1% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 mm; and the mean lesion length was 14.2 mm. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was reduced from 15.1% with the bare metal stent to 7.9% with the Endeavor ( P =0.0001), and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was reduced from 14.4% with the bare metal stent to 7.3% with the Endeavor ( P =0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was 4.6% with Endeavor compared with 11.8% with the bare metal stent ( P =0.0001). The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% with the Endeavor, which was not significantly different from 1.2% with the bare metal stent. In 531 patients submitted to angiographic follow-up, late loss was reduced from 1.03±0.58 to 0.61±0.46 ( P <0.001) in stent and from 0.72±0.61 to 0.36±0.46 ( P <0.001) in segment. The rate of in-segment restenosis was reduced from 35.0% to 13.2% with Endeavor ( P <0.0001). There was no excessive edge stenosis, aneurysm formation, or late acquired malapposition by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Differences in clinical outcome were maintained at 12 and 24 months ( P <0.0001). Conclusions— Compared with bare metal stents, the Endeavor stent is safe and reduces the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis at 9, 12, and 24 months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies
Kip, K. E., Hollabaugh, K., Marroquin, O. C., & Williams, D. O. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Fajadet, J., Wijns, W., Laarman, G.-J., Kuck, K.-H., Ormiston, J., Münzel, T., Popma, J. J., Fitzgerald, P. J., Bonan, R., & Kuntz, R. E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2006-08-22
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 798-806
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2151857625
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery Lesions: Clinical and Angiographic Results of the ENDEAVOR II Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.591206
- The paper
- Fajadet, J., Wijns, W., Laarman, G.-J., Kuck, K.-H., Ormiston, J., Münzel, T., Popma, J. J., Fitzgerald, P. J., Bonan, R., & Kuntz, R. E. (2006). Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery Lesions: Clinical and Angiographic Results of the ENDEAVOR II Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.591206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.