Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Congenital Heart Disease and Other Heterotaxic Defects in a Large Cohort of Patients With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Open access
Kennedy, Marcus P., Omran, Heymut, Leigh, Margaret W., Dell, Sharon, Morgan, Lucy, Molina, Paul L., Robinson, Blair V., Minnix, Susan L., Olbrich, Heike, Severin, Thomas, Ahrens, Peter, Lange, Lars, Morillas, Hilda N., Noone, Peadar G., Zariwala, Maimoona A., Knowles, Michael R.·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a recessive genetic disorder that is characterized by sinopulmonary disease and reflects abnormal ciliary structure and function. Situs inversus totalis occurs in ≈50% of PCD patients (Kartagener’s syndrome in PCD), and there are a few reports of PCD with heterotaxy (situs ambiguus), such as cardiovascular anomalies. Advances in diagnosis of PCD, such as genetic testing, allow the systematic investigation of this association. Methods and Results— The prevalence of heterotaxic defects was determined in 337 PCD patients by retrospective review of radiographic and ultrasound data. Situs solitus (normal situs) and situs inversus totalis were identified in 46.0% and 47.7% of patients, respectively, and 6.3% (21 patients) had heterotaxy. As compared with patients with situs solitus, those with situs abnormalities had more ciliary outer dynein arm defects, fewer inner dynein arm and central apparatus defects ( P <0.001), and more mutations in ciliary outer dynein arm genes ( DNAI1 and DNAH5 ; P =0.022). Seven of 12 patients with heterotaxy who were genotyped had mutations in DNAI1 or DNAH5 . Twelve patients with heterotaxy had cardiac and/or vascular abnormalities, and most (8 of 12 patients) had complex congenital heart disease. Conclusions— At least 6.3% of patients with PCD have heterotaxy, and most of those have cardiovascular abnormalities. The prevalence of congenital heart disease with heterotaxy is 200-fold higher in PCD than in the general population (1:50 versus 1:10 000); thus, patients with PCD should have cardiac evaluation. Conversely, mutations in genes that adversely affect both respiratory and embryological nodal cilia are a significant cause of heterotaxy and congenital heart disease, and screening for PCD is indicated in those patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.649038

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, M. P., Omran, H., Leigh, M. W., Dell, S., Morgan, L., Molina, P. L., Robinson, B. V., Minnix, S. L., Olbrich, H., Severin, T., Ahrens, P., Lange, L., Morillas, H. N., Noone, P. G., Zariwala, M. A., & Knowles, M. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
115
Issue
22
Pages
2814-2821
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2064659330
Cited by
457
References
0
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congenital Heart Disease and Other Heterotaxic Defects in a Large Cohort of Patients With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.649038
The paper
Kennedy, M. P., Omran, H., Leigh, M. W., Dell, S., Morgan, L., Molina, P. L., Robinson, B. V., Minnix, S. L., Olbrich, H., Severin, T., Ahrens, P., Lange, L., Morillas, H. N., Noone, P. G., Zariwala, M. A., & Knowles, M. R. (2007). Congenital Heart Disease and Other Heterotaxic Defects in a Large Cohort of Patients With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.649038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.