Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Open access
Petersen, Steffen E., Jerosch-Herold, Michael, Hudsmith, Lucy E., Robson, Matthew D., Francis, Jane M., Doll, Helen A., Selvanayagam, Joseph B., Neubauer, Stefan, Watkins, Hugh·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) may create an ischemic substrate conducive to sudden death, but it remains unknown whether the extent of hypertrophy is associated with proportionally poorer perfusion reserve. Comparisons between magnitude of hypertrophy, impairment of perfusion reserve, and extent of fibrosis may offer new insights for future clinical risk stratification in HCM but require multiparametric imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution. Methods and Results— Degree of hypertrophy, myocardial blood flow at rest and during hyperemia (hMBF), and myocardial fibrosis were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging in 35 HCM patients (9 [26%] male/26 female) and 14 healthy controls (4 [29%] male/10 female), aged 18 to 78 years (mean±SD, 42±14 years) with the use of the American Heart Association left ventricular 16-segment model. Resting MBF was similar in HCM patients and controls. hMBF was lower in HCM patients (1.84±0.89 mL/min per gram) than in healthy controls (3.42±1.76 mL/min per gram, with a difference of −0.95±0.30 [SE] mL/min per gram; P <0.001) after adjustment for multiple variables, including end-diastolic segmental wall thickness ( P <0.001). In HCM patients, hMBF decreased with increasing end-diastolic wall thickness ( P <0.005) and preferentially in the endocardial layer. The frequency of endocardial hMBF falling below epicardial hMBF rose with wall thickness ( P =0.045), as did the incidence of fibrosis ( P <0.001). Conclusions— In HCM the vasodilator response is reduced, particularly in the endocardium, and in proportion to the magnitude of hypertrophy. Microvascular dysfunction and subsequent ischemia may be important components of the risk attributable to HCM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.657023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, S. E., Jerosch-Herold, M., Hudsmith, L. E., Robson, M. D., Francis, J. M., Doll, H. A., Selvanayagam, J. B., Neubauer, S., & Watkins, H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-05-08
Volume
115
Issue
18
Pages
2418-2425
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2063893017
Cited by
362
References
2
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.657023
The paper
Petersen, S. E., Jerosch-Herold, M., Hudsmith, L. E., Robson, M. D., Francis, J. M., Doll, H. A., Selvanayagam, J. B., Neubauer, S., & Watkins, H. (2007). Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.657023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.