Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative Thresholds for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Open access
Oosterhof, Thomas, van Straten, Alexander, Vliegen, Hubert W., Meijboom, Folkert J., van Dijk, Arie P.J., Spijkerboer, Anje M., Bouma, Berto J., Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Hazekamp, Mark G., de Roos, Albert, Mulder, Barbara J.M.·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— To facilitate the optimal timing of pulmonary valve replacement, we analyzed preoperative thresholds of right ventricular (RV) volumes above which no decrease or normalization of RV size takes place after surgery. Methods and Results— Between 1993 and 2006, 71 adult patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot underwent pulmonary valve replacement in a nationwide, prospective follow-up study. Patients were evaluated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance both preoperatively and postoperatively. Changes in RV volumes were expressed as relative change from baseline. RV volumes decreased with a mean of 28%. RV ejection fraction did not change significantly after surgery (from 42±10% to 43±10%; P =0.34). Concomitant RV outflow tract reduction resulted in a 25% larger decrease of RV volumes. After correction for surgical RV outflow tract reduction, higher preoperative RV volumes (mL/m 2 ) were independently associated with a larger decrease of RV volumes (RV end-diastolic volume: β=0.41; P <0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a cutoff value of 160 mL/m 2 for normalization of RV end-diastolic volume or 82 mL/m 2 for RV end-systolic volume. Conclusions— Overall, we could not find a threshold above which RV volumes did not decrease after surgery. Preoperative RV volumes were independently associated with RV remodeling and also when corrected for a surgical reduction of the RV outflow tract. However, normalization could be achieved when preoperative RV end-diastolic volume was <160 mL/m 2 or RV end-systolic volume was <82 mL/m 2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.659664

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
Oosterhof, T., van Straten, A., Vliegen, H. W., Meijboom, F. J., van Dijk, A. P. J., Spijkerboer, A. M., Bouma, B. J., Zwinderman, A. H., Hazekamp, M. G., de Roos, A., & Mulder, B. J. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-07-31
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
545-551
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2163346511
Cited by
614
References
2
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Thresholds for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.659664
The paper
Oosterhof, T., van Straten, A., Vliegen, H. W., Meijboom, F. J., van Dijk, A. P. J., Spijkerboer, A. M., Bouma, B. J., Zwinderman, A. H., Hazekamp, M. G., de Roos, A., & Mulder, B. J. M. (2007). Preoperative Thresholds for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.659664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.