Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Open access
Lim, Pascal, Buakhamsri, Adisai, Popovic, Zoran B., Greenberg, Neil L., Patel, Dimpi, Thomas, James D., Grimm, Richard A.·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— In heart failure patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony, contractility in delayed segments does not fully contribute to end-systolic function. We quantified this reserve of contraction related to mechanical dyssynchrony to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by the strain delay index, which was defined as the sum of the difference between peak and end-systolic strain across 16 segments. Methods and Results— In 100 heart failure patients (ejection fraction=26±9%, QRS=154±29 ms, 94% in New York Heart Association class III), we studied left ventricular dyssynchrony before cardiac resynchronization therapy by the strain delay index using longitudinal strain by 2D speckle tracking and by the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity in 12 segments. The optimal cutoff value of the strain delay index to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was determined in a retrospective group (n=65) and then confirmed in a validation group (n=35). Left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction at 3 months >15% (responder) occurred in 64 of 100 patients. In the retrospective group, the strain delay index but not the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity was greater in responders (n=42/65) than nonresponders (35±8% versus 19±7%, P <0.0001), and the optimal cutoff value to identify response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was 25%. In the validation group, strain delay index ≥25% identified 82% (18/22) of responders and 92% (12/13) of nonresponders. Among the entire population (n=100), strain delay index correlated with reverse remodeling in both the ischemic ( r =−0.68, P <0.0001) and nonischemic ( r =−0.68, P <0.0001) population. Conclusions— Use of the strain delay index with longitudinal strain by speckle tracking has a strong predictive value for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in both ischemic and nonischemic patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.750190

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Lim, P., Buakhamsri, A., Popovic, Z. B., Greenberg, N. L., Patel, D., Thomas, J. D., & Grimm, R. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-09-09
Volume
118
Issue
11
Pages
1130-1137
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2082230085
Cited by
172
References
2
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.750190
The paper
Lim, P., Buakhamsri, A., Popovic, Z. B., Greenberg, N. L., Patel, D., Thomas, J. D., & Grimm, R. A. (2008). Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.750190

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.