The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Background— In heart failure patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony, contractility in delayed segments does not fully contribute to end-systolic function. We quantified this reserve of contraction related to mechanical dyssynchrony to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by the strain delay index, which was defined as the sum of the difference between peak and end-systolic strain across 16 segments. Methods and Results— In 100 heart failure patients (ejection fraction=26±9%, QRS=154±29 ms, 94% in New York Heart Association class III), we studied left ventricular dyssynchrony before cardiac resynchronization therapy by the strain delay index using longitudinal strain by 2D speckle tracking and by the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity in 12 segments. The optimal cutoff value of the strain delay index to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was determined in a retrospective group (n=65) and then confirmed in a validation group (n=35). Left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction at 3 months >15% (responder) occurred in 64 of 100 patients. In the retrospective group, the strain delay index but not the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity was greater in responders (n=42/65) than nonresponders (35±8% versus 19±7%, P <0.0001), and the optimal cutoff value to identify response to cardiac resynchronization therapy was 25%. In the validation group, strain delay index ≥25% identified 82% (18/22) of responders and 92% (12/13) of nonresponders. Among the entire population (n=100), strain delay index correlated with reverse remodeling in both the ischemic ( r =−0.68, P <0.0001) and nonischemic ( r =−0.68, P <0.0001) population. Conclusions— Use of the strain delay index with longitudinal strain by speckle tracking has a strong predictive value for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in both ischemic and nonischemic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., Krueger, S., Kass, D. A., De Marco, T., Carson, P., DiCarlo, L., DeMets, D., White, B. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032423 · Cited by 5,812
Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure
Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., Delurgio, D. B., Leon, A. R., Loh, E., Kocovic, D. Z., Packer, M., Clavell, A. L., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013168 · Cited by 4,648
Cited by
Mor-Avi, V., Lang, R. M., Badano, L. P., Belohlavek, M., Cardim, N. M., Derumeaux, G., Galderisi, M., Marwick, T., Nagueh, S. F., Sengupta, P. P., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationMyocardial Work in Echocardiography
Marzlin, N., Hays, A. G., Peters, M., Kaminski, A., Roemer, S., O’Leary, P., Kroboth, S., Harland, D. R., Khandheria, B. K., Tajik, A. J., et al. (2023) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.122.014419 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, P., Buakhamsri, A., Popovic, Z. B., Greenberg, N. L., Patel, D., Thomas, J. D., & Grimm, R. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2008-09-09
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1130-1137
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2082230085
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.750190
- The paper
- Lim, P., Buakhamsri, A., Popovic, Z. B., Greenberg, N. L., Patel, D., Thomas, J. D., & Grimm, R. A. (2008). Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.750190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.