Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corticosteroids for Recurrent Pericarditis: High Versus Low Doses: A Nonrandomized Observation

Open access
Imazio, Massimo, Brucato, Antonio, Cumetti, Davide, Brambilla, Giovanni, Demichelis, Brunella, Ferro, Silvia, Maestroni, Silvia, Cecchi, Enrico, Belli, Riccardo, Palmieri, Giancarlo, Trinchero, Rita·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Corticosteroid use is widespread in recurrent pericarditis, even if rarely indicated, and high doses (eg, prednisone 1.0 to 1.5 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ) are generally recommended, although only weak evidence supports their use with possible severe side effects. The aim of this work was to compare side effects, recurrences and other complications, and hospitalizations of a low- versus high-dose regimen of prednisone for recurrent pericarditis. Methods and Results— A retrospective review of all cases of recurrent pericarditis treated with corticosteroids according to different regimens from January 1996 to June 2004 was performed in 2 Italian referral centers. One hundred patients with recurrent pericarditis (mean age, 50.1±15.8 years; 57 females) were included in the study; 49 patients (mean age, 47.5±16.0; 25 females) were treated with low doses of prednisone (0.2 to 0.5 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ), and 51 patients (mean age, 52.6±15.3; 32 females) were treated with prednisone 1.0 mg · kg −1 · d −1 . Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced across the groups. Each initial dose was maintained for 4 weeks and then slowly tapered. After adjustment for potential confounders (age, female gender, nonidiopathic origin), only high doses of prednisone were associated with severe side effects, recurrences, and hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.96 to 6.63; P <0.001). Conclusions— Use of higher doses of prednisone (1.0 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ) for recurrent pericarditis is associated with more side effects, recurrences, and hospitalizations. Lower doses of prednisone should be considered when corticosteroids are needed to treat pericarditis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.761064

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Imazio, M., Brucato, A., Cumetti, D., Brambilla, G., Demichelis, B., Ferro, S., Maestroni, S., Cecchi, E., Belli, R., Palmieri, G., & Trinchero, R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-08-05
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
667-671
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2062428590
Cited by
273
References
0
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticosteroids for Recurrent Pericarditis: High Versus Low Doses: A Nonrandomized Observation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.761064
The paper
Imazio, M., Brucato, A., Cumetti, D., Brambilla, G., Demichelis, B., Ferro, S., Maestroni, S., Cecchi, E., Belli, R., Palmieri, G., & Trinchero, R. (2008). Corticosteroids for Recurrent Pericarditis: High Versus Low Doses: A Nonrandomized Observation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.761064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.