Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Open access
Kang, Duk-Hyun, Kim, Jeong Hoon, Rim, Ji Hye, Kim, Mi-Jeong, Yun, Sung-Cheol, Song, Jong-Min, Song, Hyun, Choi, Kee-Joon, Song, Jae-Kwan, Lee, Jae-Won·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The optimal timing of surgical intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation is unclear. We therefore compared the long-term results of early surgery with a conventional treatment strategy. Methods and Results— From 1996 to 2005, 447 consecutive asymptomatic patients (253 men, age 50±15 years) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function were evaluated prospectively. The end point was defined as the composite of operative mortality, cardiac death, repeat mitral valve surgery, and urgent admission due to congestive heart failure during follow-up. Early surgery was performed on 161 patients (operated group), and the conventional treatment strategy was used for 286 patients (conventional treatment group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, euroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), or ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 1988 days, there were 2 repeat surgeries and no cardiac deaths or operative mortality in the operated group compared with 12 cardiac deaths, 1 repeat surgery, and 22 admissions for congestive heart failure in the conventional treatment group. The estimated actuarial 7-year cardiac mortality rate was 0% in the operated group and 5±2% in the conventional treatment group ( P =0.008), and for 127 propensity score-matched pairs, the estimated actuarial 7-year event-free survival rate was significantly higher in the operated than in the conventional treatment group (99±1% versus 85±4%, P =0.007). In the conventional treatment group, baseline grade of pulmonary hypertension (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.87, P =0.003), age (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04, P =0.005), and effective regurgitant orifice area (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.82, P =0.02) were independent variables that predicted late development of surgical indications or congestive heart failure on Cox multivariate analysis. Conclusions— Compared with conservative management, the strategy of early surgery was associated with an improved long-term event rate by decreasing cardiac mortality and congestive heart failure hospitalization more effectively in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. Early surgery may therefore further improve clinical outcomes in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation with preserved left ventricular systolic function and a high likelihood of mitral valve repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.108.802314

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Kang, D.-H., Kim, J. H., Rim, J. H., Kim, M.-J., Yun, S.-C., Song, J.-M., Song, H., Choi, K.-J., Song, J.-K., & Lee, J.-W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-02-17
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
797-804
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2155596187
Cited by
306
References
0
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.108.802314
The paper
Kang, D.-H., Kim, J. H., Rim, J. H., Kim, M.-J., Yun, S.-C., Song, J.-M., Song, H., Choi, K.-J., Song, J.-K., & Lee, J.-W. (2009). Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.802314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.