Cited by 167Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee Consumption and Risk of Stroke in Women

Open access
Lopez-Garcia, Esther, Rodriguez-Artalejo, Fernando, Rexrode, Kathryn M., Logroscino, Giancarlo, Hu, Frank B., van Dam, Rob M.·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Data on the association between coffee consumption and risk of stroke are sparse. We assessed the association between coffee consumption and the risk of stroke over 24 years of follow-up in women. Methods and Results— We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of 83 076 women in the Nurses’ Health Study without history of stroke, coronary heart disease, diabetes, or cancer at baseline. Coffee consumption was assessed first in 1980 and then repeatedly every 2 to 4 years, with follow-up through 2004. We documented 2280 strokes, of which 426 were hemorrhagic, 1224 were ischemic, and 630 were undetermined. In multivariable Cox regression models with adjustment for age, smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, alcohol intake, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy, aspirin use, and dietary factors, the relative risks (RRs) of stroke across categories of coffee consumption (<1 cup per month, 1 per month to 4 per week, 5 to 7 per week, 2 to 3 per day, and ≥4 per day) were 1, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.02), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.95), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98) ( P for trend=0.003). After further adjustment for high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and type 2 diabetes, the inverse association remained significant. The association was stronger among never and past smokers (RR for ≥4 cups a day versus <1 cup a month, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.84) than among current smokers (RR for ≥4 cups a day versus <1 cup a month, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.48). Other drinks containing caffeine such as tea and caffeinated soft drinks were not associated with stroke. Decaffeinated coffee was associated with a trend toward lower risk of stroke after adjustment for caffeinated coffee consumption (RR for ≥2 cups a day versus <1 cup a month, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.08; P for trend=0.05). Conclusions— Long-term coffee consumption was not associated with an increased risk of stroke in women. In contrast, our data suggest that coffee consumption may modestly reduce risk of stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.108.826164

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Nurses' Health Study, women who drank 4 or more cups of coffee per day had a 20% lower risk of stroke than those who did not consume coffee.

    “Similarly, in the Nurses' Health Study, women who drank 4 or more cups of coffee per day had a 20% lower risk of stroke than those who did not consume coffee.26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 167

Authors
Lopez-Garcia, E., Rodriguez-Artalejo, F., Rexrode, K. M., Logroscino, G., Hu, F. B., & van Dam, R. M.
Affiliations
  • From the Departments of Nutrition (E.L.-G., F.B.H., R.M.v.D.) and Epidemiology (G.L., F.B.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (E.L.G., F.R.A.), School of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (E.L.G., F.R.-A.), Barcelona, Spain; the Channing Laboratory (F.B.H., R.M.v.D.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and...
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-03-03
Volume
119
Issue
8
Pages
1116-1123
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2120546505
Cited by
167
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-088521, HL34594, R01HL034594, R01HL088521)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-87969, CA-55075, P01CA087969, P01CA055075)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058845, DK58845)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, stroke risk, women, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, caffeine, decaffeinated coffee, tea, smoking, blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, Nurses' Health Study, prospective cohort, cardiovascular risk factors, hormone replacement therapy, aspirin use, menopausal status, physical activity, alcohol consumption, body mass index
MeSH terms
Coffee, Drinking Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review