Cited by 310Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Is a Major Predictor of the Development of Atrial Fibrillation: The Cardiovascular Health Study

Open access
Patton, Kristen K., Ellinor, Patrick T., Heckbert, Susan R., Christenson, Robert H., DeFilippi, Christopher, Gottdiener, John S., Kronmal, Richard A.·2009·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac rhythm abnormality, is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide levels have been associated with the risk of heart failure, AF, and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relation between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and AF was studied in 5445 Cardiovascular Health Study participants with the use of relative risk regression for predicting prevalent AF and Cox proportional hazards for predicting incident AF. NT-proBNP levels were strongly associated with prevalent AF, with an unadjusted prevalence ratio of 128 for the highest quintile (95% confidence interval, 17.9 to 913.3; P<0.001) and adjusted prevalence ratio of 147 for the highest quintile (95% confidence interval, 20.4 to 1064.3; P<0.001) compared with the lowest. After a median follow-up of 10 years (maximum of 16 years), there were 1126 cases of incident AF (a rate of 2.2 per 100 person-years). NT-proBNP was highly predictive of incident AF, with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 5.2 (95% confidence interval, 4.3 to 6.4; P<0.001) for the development of AF for the highest quintile compared with the lowest; for the same contrast, NT-proBNP remained the strongest predictor of incident AF after adjustment for an extensive number of covariates, including age, sex, medication use, blood pressure, echocardiographic parameters, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 5.0; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based population of older adults, NT-proBNP was a remarkable predictor of incident AF, independent of any other previously described risk factor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.873265

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides are elevated in AF patients, there is insufficient data to suggest that blood-based parameters are independent markers for AF.

    “Although biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides are elevated in AF patients, there is insufficient data to suggest that blood-based parameters are independent markers for AF.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 310

Authors
Patton, K. K., Ellinor, P. T., Heckbert, S. R., Christenson, R. H., DeFilippi, C., Gottdiener, J. S., & Kronmal, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-11-03
Volume
120
Issue
18
Pages
1768-1774
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2077013088
Cited by
310
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01hc085079-024, n01hc085084-005, n01hc085085-011, n01hc085083-027, n01hc085080-026, n01hc085086-022, n01hc55222-0-0-0, n01hc075150-004)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85085, N01 HC085086, N01HC-85083, N01 HC085079, N01HC85082, N01HC‐75150, N01 HC85086, HHSN 268200800007C, N01HC85080, N01 HC55222, U01HL080295, N01 HC055222, N01 HC075150, N01-HC85079, ­N01-HC85084)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, NT-proBNP, atrial fibrillation, incident atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation risk prediction, cardiovascular biomarkers, older adults, Cardiovascular Health Study, heart failure
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peptide Fragments, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review