Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health: Lessons Learned From Epidemiological Studies Across Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide physicians and the general public with a responsible assessment of the relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular health. PARTICIPANTS: A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 13-member panel representing the fields of cardiology, psychology, exercise physiology, nutrition, pediatrics, public health, and epidemiology. In addition, 27 experts in cardiology, psychology, epidemiology, exercise physiology, geriatrics, nutrition, pediatrics, public health, and sports medicine presented data to the panel and a conference audience of 600. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched through Medline and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. CONCLUSIONS: All Americans should engage in regular physical activity at a level appropriate to their capacity, needs, and interest.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exercise is a powerful intervention in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease across a wide range of exercise volumes and intensities, including among competitive athletes.
“Exercise is a powerful intervention in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease for which compelling evidence exists across a wide range of exercise volumes and intensities, including among competitive athletes.4,26,37”
From Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes (2012) · cites this paper as [26]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 91 · Cited by 578
- Authors
- Shiroma, E. J., & Lee, I.-M.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2010-08-17
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 743-752
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2073263541
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Keywords
- physical activity, cardiovascular health, cardiovascular risk factors, physical inactivity, moderate-intensity exercise, exercise recommendations, cardiac rehabilitation, health benefits of exercise, high-intensity exercise
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Ethnicity, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Learning, Motor Activity, Sex Factors, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review