Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optical Coherence Tomographic Analysis of In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis After Drug–Eluting Stent Implantation

Open access
Kang, Soo-Jin, Mintz, Gary S., Akasaka, Takashi, Park, Duk-Woo, Lee, Jong-Young, Kim, Won-Jang, Lee, Seung-Whan, Kim, Young-Hak, Whan Lee, Cheol, Park, Seong-Wook, Park, Seung-Jung·2011·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: We report findings from optical coherence tomography (OCT) of in-stent neoatherosclerosis as a cause of drug-eluting stent (DES) failure. Methods and Results—: Optical coherence tomography and grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound were performed in 50 patients (30 stable, 20 unstable angina) with 50 DES in-stent restenosis lesions and intimal hyperplasia >50% of stent area. Median follow-up time was 32.2 months. Overall, 26 lesions (52%) had at least 1 OCT-defined in-stent thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA)–containing neointima and 29 (58%) had at least 1 in-stent neointimal rupture. Patients presenting with unstable angina showed a thinner fibrous cap (55 μm [interquartile range 42 to 105 μm] versus 100 μm [interquartile range 60 to 205 μm], P =0.006) and higher incidence of OCT-defined TCFA-containing neointima (75% versus 37%, P =0.008), intimal rupture (75% versus 47%, P =0.044), thrombi (80% versus 43%, P =0.010), and red thrombi (30% versus 3%, P =0.012) than stable patients. Fibrous cap thickness negatively correlated with follow-up time ( r =−0.318, P =0.024). Compared with DES <20 months after implantation (the best cut-off to predict TCFA-containing neointima), DES ≥20 months after implantation had a higher incidence of TCFA-containing neointima (69% versus 33%, P =0.012) and red thrombi (27% versus 0%, P =0.007). Patients with unstable (versus stable) angina had an increasing number of unstable OCT findings including TCFA-containing neointima, neointima rupture, and thrombus ( P =0.027). The rate of agreement between grayscale intravascular ultrasound and OCT for detecting intimal rupture was 50% and for detecting thrombus was 44%. The agreement between virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and OCT for identifying TCFA-containing neointima was 78%. Conclusions—: In-stent neoatherosclerosis may be an important mechanism of DES failure, especially late after implantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.110.988436

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Kang, S.-J., Mintz, G. S., Akasaka, T., Park, D.-W., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, W.-J., Lee, S.-W., Kim, Y.-H., Whan Lee, C., Park, S.-W., & Park, S.-J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
123
Issue
25
Pages
2954-2963
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2020417508
Cited by
359
References
0
FWCI
39.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Coherence Tomographic Analysis of In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis After Drug–Eluting Stent Implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.988436
The paper
Kang, S.-J., Mintz, G. S., Akasaka, T., Park, D.-W., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, W.-J., Lee, S.-W., Kim, Y.-H., Whan Lee, C., Park, S.-W., & Park, S.-J. (2011). Optical Coherence Tomographic Analysis of In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis After Drug–Eluting Stent Implantation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.988436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.