Eplerenone in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure and Mild Symptoms: Analysis of Repeat Hospitalizations
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Eplerenone is known to reduce time to first hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure and mild symptoms. In chronic diseases such as heart failure, characterized by repeat hospitalizations, analyzing all heart failure hospitalizations, not just the first, should give a more complete picture of treatment benefits. Methods and Results—: The Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and SurvIval Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF) trial compared eplerenone with placebo in 2737 patients with mild heart failure, followed for a median 2.08 years (interquartile range, 1.08–3.10 years). Data were collected on all hospitalizations, with a focus on those due to heart failure. Heart failure hospitalization rates in the eplerenone and placebo groups were 10.70 and 16.99 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Allowing for skewness in the frequency of hospitalizations by using the negative binomial generalized linear model, the rate ratio (eplerenone versus placebo) was 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.66; P <0.0001). A plot of cumulative hospitalization rates over time revealed that most of the reduced risk on eplerenone occurred in the first year of follow-up. Several baseline variables strongly predicted the risk of hospitalization. More complex statistical methods, adjusting for mortality (as informative censoring), made a negligible difference in these findings. Conclusions—: Eplerenone markedly reduces the risk of heart failure hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and mild symptoms to a greater extent than is captured by only studying the time to first hospitalization. Future clinical trials in heart failure would gain from incorporating repeat hospitalizations into their primary evaluation of treatment effects. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00232180.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a pre-specified statistical method, negative binomial regression was used to calculate rates and rate ratios for total cardiovascular events.
“As a pre-specified statistical method, we used the negative binomial regression model to calculate rates and rate ratios for total cardiovascular events, which accounts for the variability in each patient's risk of events (45-47).”
From Effects of Icosapent Ethyl on Total Ischemic Events (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 224
- Authors
- Rogers, J. K., McMurray, J. J. V., Pocock, S. J., Zannad, F., Krum, H., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Swedberg, K., Shi, H., Vincent, J., & Pitt, B.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- From the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (J.K.R., S.J.P.); University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (J.J.V.M.); Nancy University, Nancy, France (F.Z.); Monash Centre of Cardiovascular Research & Education in Therapeutics, Melbourne, Australia (H.K.); University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands (D.J.V.); Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (K.S.); Pfizer, New York, NY (H.S., J.V.); and University of...
- ORCID
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2012-11-06
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2317-2323
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2014415076
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
- Keywords
- eplerenone, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, mild heart failure, heart failure hospitalization, recurrent hospitalization, negative binomial regression, informative censoring, treatment effect estimation, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
- MeSH terms
- Eplerenone, Aged, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Spironolactone, Time Factors, Incidence, Linear Models, Heart Failure, Systolic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review