The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Adoption of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) in the United States is low and may be related to challenges learning the technique. We examined the relationships between operator TRI volume and procedural metrics and outcomes. Methods and Results—: We used CathPCI Registry data from July 2009 to December 2012 to identify new radial operators, defined by an exclusively femoral percutaneous coronary intervention approach for 6 months after their first percutaneous coronary intervention in the database and ≥15 total TRIs thereafter. Primary outcomes of fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure success were chosen as markers of technical proficiency. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications. Adjusted outcomes were analyzed by using operator TRI experience as a continuous variable with generalized linear mixed models. Among 54 561 TRI procedures performed at 704 sites, 942 operators performed 1 to 10 procedures, 942 operators performed 11 to 50 procedures, 375 operators performed 51 to 100 procedures, and 148 operators performed 101 to 200 procedures. As radial caseload increased, more TRIs were performed in women, in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and for emergency indications. Decreased fluoroscopy time and contrast use were nonlinearly associated with greater operator TRI experience, with faster reductions observed for newer (<30–50 cases) compared with more experienced (>30–50 cases) operators. Procedure success was high, whereas mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications remained low across TRI volumes. Conclusions—: As operator TRI volume increases, higher-risk patients are chosen for TRI. Despite this, operator proficiency improves with greater TRI experience, and safety is maintained. The threshold to overcome the learning curve appears to be approximately 30 to 50 cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Valgimigli, M., Gagnor, A., Calabró, P., Frigoli, E., Leonardi, S., Zaro, T., Rubartelli, P., Briguori, C., Andò, G., Repetto, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60292-6 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationProcedural Experience for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Relation to Outcomes
Carroll, J. D., Vemulapalli, S., Dai, D., Matsouaka, R., Blackstone, E., Edwards, F., Masoudi, F. A., Mack, M., Peterson, E. D., Holmes, D., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.056 · Cited by 258
Self-citationBioresorbable Stents: Is This Where We Are Headed?
Wayangankar, S. A., & Ellis, S. G. (2015) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2015.08.011 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hess, C. N., Peterson, E. D., Neely, M. L., Dai, D., Hillegass, W. B., Krucoff, M. W., Kutcher, M. A., Messenger, J. C., Pancholy, S., Piana, R. N., & Rao, S. V.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2014-06-03
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2277-2286
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2120948153
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.113.006356
- The paper
- Hess, C. N., Peterson, E. D., Neely, M. L., Dai, D., Hillegass, W. B., Krucoff, M. W., Kutcher, M. A., Messenger, J. C., Pancholy, S., Piana, R. N., & Rao, S. V. (2014). The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.006356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.