Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 618

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Sex on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Cardiac Outcomes

Open access
Murthy, Venkatesh L., Naya, Masanao, Taqueti, Viviany R., Foster, Courtney R., Gaber, Mariya, Hainer, Jon, Dorbala, Sharmila, Blankstein, Ron, Rimoldi, Ornella, Camici, Paolo G., Di Carli, Marcelo F.·2014·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a prevalent and prognostically important finding in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease. The relative extent to which CMD affects both sexes is largely unknown. Methods and Results—: We investigated 405 men and 813 women who were referred for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease with no previous history of coronary artery disease and no visual evidence of coronary artery disease on rest/stress positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Coronary flow reserve was quantified, and coronary flow reserve <2.0 was used to define the presence of CMD. Major adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, late revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure, were assessed in a blinded fashion over a median follow-up of 1.3 years (interquartile range, 0.5–2.3 years). CMD was highly prevalent both in men and women (51% and 54%, respectively; Fisher exact test =0.39; equivalence P =0.0002). Regardless of sex, coronary flow reserve was a powerful incremental predictor of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.75–086] per 10% increase in coronary flow reserve; P <0.0001) and resulted in favorable net reclassification improvement (0.280 [95% confidence interval, 0.049–0.512]), after adjustment for clinical risk and ventricular function. In a subgroup (n=404; 307 women/97 men) without evidence of coronary artery calcification on gated computed tomography imaging, CMD was common in both sexes, despite normal stress perfusion imaging and no coronary artery calcification (44% of men versus 48% of women; Fisher exact test P =0.56; equivalence P =0.041). Conclusions—: CMD is highly prevalent among at-risk individuals and is associated with adverse outcomes regardless of sex. The high prevalence of CMD in both sexes suggests that it may be a useful target for future therapeutic interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.008507

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 618

Metadata

Authors
Murthy, V. L., Naya, M., Taqueti, V. R., Foster, C. R., Gaber, M., Hainer, J., Dorbala, S., Blankstein, R., Rimoldi, O., Camici, P. G., & Di Carli, M. F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
129
Issue
24
Pages
2518-2527
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1970402870
Cited by
618
References
3
FWCI
29.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Sex on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Cardiac Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.113.008507
The paper
Murthy, V. L., Naya, M., Taqueti, V. R., Foster, C. R., Gaber, M., Hainer, J., Dorbala, S., Blankstein, R., Rimoldi, O., Camici, P. G., & Di Carli, M. F. (2014). Effects of Sex on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Cardiac Outcomes. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.008507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.