Cited by 265Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Restarting Anticoagulant Treatment After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and the Impact on Recurrent Stroke, Mortality, and Bleeding: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Open access
Nielsen, Peter Brønnum, Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard, Skjøth, Flemming, Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders, Rasmussen, Lars Hvilsted, Lip, Gregory Y.H.·2015·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage is the most feared complication of oral anticoagulant treatment. The optimal treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an intracranial hemorrhage remains unknown. We hypothesized that restarting oral anticoagulant treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke and mortality in comparison with not restarting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Linkage of 3 Danish nationwide registries in the period between 1997 and 2013 identified patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulant treatment with incident intracranial hemorrhage. Patients were stratified by treatment regimens (no treatment, oral anticoagulant treatment, or antiplatelet therapy) after the intracranial hemorrhage. Event rates were assessed 6 weeks after hospital discharge and compared with Cox proportional hazard models. In 1752 patients (1 year of follow-up), the rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) for patients treated with oral anticoagulants was 13.6, in comparison with 27.3 for nontreated patients and 25.7 for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) for recurrent intracranial hemorrhage, the rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) patients treated with oral anticoagulants was 8.0, in comparison with 8.6 for nontreated patients and 5.3 for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The adjusted hazard ratio of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality was 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.78) in patients on oral anticoagulant treatment in comparison with no treatment. For ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and for all-cause mortality, hazard ratios were 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.03) and 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral anticoagulant treatment was associated with a significant reduction in ischemic stroke/all-cause mortality rates, supporting oral anticoagulant treatment reintroduction after intracranial hemorrhage as feasible. Future trials are encouraged to guide clinical practice in these patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.015735

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 265

Authors
Nielsen, P. B., Larsen, T. B., Skjøth, F., Gorst-Rasmussen, A., Rasmussen, L. H., & Lip, G. Y. H.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • From Department of Cardiology, Atrial Fibrillation Study group, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (P.B.N., T.B.L., F.S., A.G.-R., L.H.R.); Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Denmark (P.B.N., T.B.L., F.S., A.G.-R., L.H.R., G.Y.H.L.); and University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.).
Venue
Circulation
Published
2015-08-11
Volume
132
Issue
6
Pages
517-525
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2120979457
Cited by
265
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 7
FWCI
29.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
intracranial hemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulants, antiplatelet therapy, recurrent intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, bleeding complications, registry linkage, post-hospitalization
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Cause of Death, Denmark, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Synergism, Embolism, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Male, Mortality, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Recurrence, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Databases, Factual, Risk Assessment, Polypharmacy, Thrombophilia, Intracranial Hemorrhages, Stroke, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review