Cited by 126Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions Determined by Ion Mobility and First Cardiovascular Events After Random Allocation to High-Intensity Statin or Placebo: The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) Trial

Open access
Mora, Samia, Caulfield, Michael P., Wohlgemuth, Jay, Chen, Zhihong, Superko, H. Robert, Rowland, Charles M., Glynn, Robert J., Ridker, Paul M +1 more·2015·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can occur in individuals with low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C). We investigated whether detailed measures of LDL subfractions and other lipoproteins can be used to assess CVD risk in a population with both low LDL-C and high C-reactive protein who were randomized to high-intensity statin or placebo. Methods and Results—: In 11 186 Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) participants, we tested whether lipids, apolipoproteins, and ion mobility–measured particle concentrations at baseline and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo were associated with first CVD events (n=307) or CVD/all-cause death (n=522). In placebo-allocated participants, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per SD, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–1.21). In contrast, associations with CVD events were observed for baseline non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01–1.38), apolipoprotein B (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11–1.48), and ion mobility–measured non-HDL particles (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05–1.35) and LDL particles (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07–1.37). Association with CVD events was also observed for several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions but not for ion mobility–measured HDL subfractions. In statin-allocated participants, CVD events were associated with on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B; these were also associated with CVD/all-cause death, as were several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions, albeit with a pattern of association that differed from the baseline risk. Conclusions—: In JUPITER, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD events, in contrast with significant associations for non-HDL cholesterol and atherogenic particles: apolipoprotein B and ion mobility–measured non-HDL particles, LDL particles, and select subfractions of very-low-density lipoprotein particles and LDL particles. During high-intensity statin therapy, on-treatment levels of LDL-C and atherogenic particles were associated with residual risk of CVD/all-cause death. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00239681.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.016857

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ApoB immunoassays have been shown to be at least equivalent to LDLP in predicting cardiovascular risk.

    “These immunoassays obviate the need for lipoprotein subfractionation techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or ion mobility to quantify LDLP and have been shown to be at least equivalent to LDLP in predicting cardiovascular risk [61,62].”

    From Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: Consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (Baseline measures and incident CVD events; page unavailable) report similar associations with cardiovascular events for apoB and ion-mobility-measured LDL-p in the placebo group (hazard ratios per SD: 1.28 and 1.21). The paper does not establish that apoB immunoassays are equivalent predictors or make subfractionation unnecessary; the Results (Incremental prognostic value; page unavailable) instead report improved prediction when ion-mobility subfractions were added to a risk model. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ApoB immunoassays obviate the need for lipoprotein subfractionation techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or ion mobility to quantify LDLP.

    “These immunoassays obviate the need for lipoprotein subfractionation techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or ion mobility to quantify LDLP and have been shown to be at least equivalent to LDLP in predicting cardiovascular risk [61,62].”

    From Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: Consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    The paper explains that each VLDL, IDL and LDL particle contains one apoB molecule, so apoB measures total atherogenic lipoprotein concentration (introductory text indexed under Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable). It distinguishes that measure from LDL particle number, which ion mobility determines directly. It does not say that apoB immunoassays quantify LDL-p specifically or obviate NMR or ion-mobility subfractionation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This necessarily results in on-treatment LDL and VLDL particle numbers that are higher than would be anticipated from the concurrent LDLC follow-up measurement and may explain part of residual risk among statin-treated patients.

    “This necessarily results in on-treatment LDL and VLDL particle numbers that are higher than would be anticipated from the concurrent LDLC follow-up measurement and may explain part of residual risk among statin-treated patients [62,90].”

    From Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: Consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results report that rosuvastatin lowered LDL particle numbers less than LDL-c (27.8% versus 48.5%), and the Discussion links on-treatment atherogenic particles, including VLDL subfractions, to residual risk. The paper does not establish that LDL and VLDL particle numbers are necessarily higher than a concurrent LDL-c measurement would predict for every statin-treated patient. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ApoB cannot substitute for NMR or ion mobility-based particle size measurements and does not differentiate between LDL and VLDL particle numbers.

    “However, apoB cannot substitute for NMRor ion mobility-based particle size measurements and does not differentiate between LDL and VLDL particle numbers [61,62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 126

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Rothman KJ Lash TL Greenland S Rothman KJ Lash TL Greenland S Modern epidemiology. Modern epidemiology 2012 Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA

Authors
Mora, S., Caulfield, M. P., Wohlgemuth, J., Chen, Z., Superko, H. R., Rowland, C. M., Glynn, R. J., Ridker, P. M., & Krauss, R. M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
132
Issue
23
Pages
2220-2229
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2227482939
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Quest Diagnostics
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL117861, U01HL069757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
LDL subfractions, ion mobility, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, low LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, rosuvastatin, JUPITER trial, C-reactive protein, cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, apolipoproteins
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Lipoproteins, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Ion Transport, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Atherosclerosis, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review