Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanisms of Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Taniwaki, Masanori, Radu, Maria D., Zaugg, Serge, Amabile, Nicolas, Garcia-Garcia, Hector M., Yamaji, Kyohei, Jørgensen, Erik, Kelbæk, Henning, Pilgrim, Thomas, Caussin, Christophe, Zanchin, Thomas, Veugeois, Aurelie, Abildgaard, Ulrik, Jüni, Peter, Cook, Stephane, Koskinas, Konstantinos C., Windecker, Stephan, Räber, Lorenz·2016·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: The pathomechanisms underlying very late stent thrombosis (VLST) after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) are incompletely understood. Using optical coherence tomography, we investigated potential causes of this adverse event. Methods and Results—: Between August 2010 and December 2014, 64 patients were investigated at the time point of VLST as part of an international optical coherence tomography registry. Optical coherence tomography pullbacks were performed after restoration of flow and analyzed at 0.4 mm. A total of 38 early- and 20 newer-generation drug-eluting stents were suitable for analysis. VLST occurred at a median of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 3.1–7.5 years). An underlying putative cause by optical coherence tomography was identified in 98% of cases. The most frequent findings were strut malapposition (34.5%), neoatherosclerosis (27.6%), uncovered struts (12.1%), and stent underexpansion (6.9%). Uncovered and malapposed struts were more frequent in thrombosed compared with nonthrombosed regions (ratio of percentages, 8.26; 95% confidence interval, 6.82–10.04; P <0.001 and 13.03; 95% confidence interval, 10.13–16.93; P <0.001, respectively). The maximal length of malapposed or uncovered struts (3.40 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.55–4.25; versus 1.29 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.77; P <0.001), but not the maximal or average axial malapposition distance, was greater in thrombosed compared with nonthrombosed segments. The associations of both uncovered and malapposed struts with thrombus were consistent among early- and newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Conclusions—: The leading associated findings in VLST patients in descending order were malapposition, neoatherosclerosis, uncovered struts, and stent underexpansion without differences between patients treated with early- and new-generation drug-eluting stents. The longitudinal extension of malapposed and uncovered stent was the most important correlate of thrombus formation in VLST.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.019071

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Taniwaki, M., Radu, M. D., Zaugg, S., Amabile, N., Garcia-Garcia, H. M., Yamaji, K., Jørgensen, E., Kelbæk, H., Pilgrim, T., Caussin, C., Zanchin, T., Veugeois, A., Abildgaard, U., Jüni, P., Cook, S., Koskinas, K. C., Windecker, S., & Räber, L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
133
Issue
7
Pages
650-660
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2238136941
Cited by
327
References
0
FWCI
49.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.115.019071
The paper
Taniwaki, M., Radu, M. D., Zaugg, S., Amabile, N., Garcia-Garcia, H. M., Yamaji, K., Jørgensen, E., Kelbæk, H., Pilgrim, T., Caussin, C., Zanchin, T., Veugeois, A., Abildgaard, U., Jüni, P., Cook, S., Koskinas, K. C., Windecker, S., & Räber, L. (2016). Mechanisms of Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.019071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.