The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of Death in Contemporary Adult Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Eisenmenger syndrome is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus, however, on mortality risk stratification. We aimed to investigate survival and predictors of death in a large, contemporary cohort of Eisenmenger syndrome patients. Methods: In a multicenter approach, we identified adults with Eisenmenger syndrome under follow-up between 2000 and 2015. We examined survival and its association with clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters. Results: We studied 1098 patients (median age, 34.4 years; range, 16.1–84.4 years; 65.1% female; 31.9% with Down syndrome). The majority had a posttricuspid defect (n=643, 58.6%), followed by patients with a complex (n=315, 28.7%) and pretricuspid lesion (n=140, 12.7%). Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4–5.9), allowing for 4361.6 patient-years observation, 278 patients died and 6 underwent transplantation. Twelve parameters emerged as significant predictors of death on univariable analysis. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41/10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–1.59; P <0.001), pretricuspid shunt (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02–2.39; P =0.041), oxygen saturation at rest (HR, 0.53/10%; 95% CI, 0.43–0.65; P <0.001), presence of sinus rhythm (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32–0.88; P =0.013), and presence of pericardial effusion (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.59–3.66; P <0.001) remained significant predictors of death. Conclusions: There is significant premature mortality among contemporary adults with Eisenmenger syndrome. We report, herewith, a multivariable mortality risk stratification model based on 5 simple, noninvasive predictors of death in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
Cited by
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Das, S. R., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000659 · Cited by 9,036
Metadata
- Authors
- Kempny, A., Hjortshøj, C. S., Gu, H., Li, W., Opotowsky, A. R., Landzberg, M. J., Jensen, A. S., Søndergaard, L., Estensen, M.-E., Thilén, U., Budts, W., Mulder, B. J., Blok, I., Tomkiewicz-Pająk, L., Szostek, K., D’Alto, M., Scognamiglio, G., Prokšelj, K., Diller, G.-P., Dimopoulos, K., Wort, S. J., & Gatzoulis, M. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2017-04-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1432-1440
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2561078682
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Death in Contemporary Adult Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.116.023033
- The paper
- Kempny, A., Hjortshøj, C. S., Gu, H., Li, W., Opotowsky, A. R., Landzberg, M. J., Jensen, A. S., Søndergaard, L., Estensen, M.-E., Thilén, U., Budts, W., Mulder, B. J., Blok, I., Tomkiewicz-Pająk, L., Szostek, K., D’Alto, M., Scognamiglio, G., Prokšelj, K., Diller, G.-P., . . . Gatzoulis, M. A. (2017). Predictors of Death in Contemporary Adult Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.023033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.