CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Head‐to‐head comparison of the alivecor heart monitor and microlife watchbp office AFIB for atrial fibrillation screening in a primary care setting

Chan, Pak-Hei, Wong, Chun-Ka, Pun, Louise, Wong, Yu-Fai, Wong, Michelle Man-Ying, Chu, Daniel Wai-Sing, Siu, Chung-Wah·2017·Circulation
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.116.024439
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.116.024439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Pak-Hei Chan et al., when atrial fibrillation prevalence was low (2.7%), Alivecor Kardia sensitivity was 71.4%.

    “In another large study by Pak‐Hei Chan 11 where the prevalence of atrial fibrillation was low (2.7%), the sensitivity of the device was only 71.4%.”

    From Portable out-of-hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 79

Authors
Chan, P.-H., Wong, C.-K., Pun, L., Wong, Y.-F., Wong, M. M.-Y., Chu, D. W.-S., & Siu, C.-W.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
ORCID
Venue
Circulation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2017-01-03
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
110-112
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.116.024439
OpenAlex
W2563358367
Cited by
79
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation screening, primary care, device comparison
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Oscillometry, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Single-Blind Method, Area Under Curve, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review