Cited by 228Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Open access
Tjong, Fleur V.Y., Reddy, Vivek Y.·2017·Circulation

Abstract

A new technology, leadless pacemaker therapy, was recently introduced clinically to address lead- and pocket-related complications in conventional transvenous pacemaker therapy. These leadless devices are self-contained right ventricular single-chamber pacemakers implanted by using a femoral percutaneous approach. In this review of available clinical data on leadless pacemakers, early results with leadless devices are compared with historical results with conventional single-chamber pacing. Both presently manufactured leadless pacemakers show similar complications, which are mostly related to the implant procedure: cardiac perforation, device dislocation, and femoral vascular access site complications. In comparison with conventional transvenous single-chamber pacemakers, slightly higher short-term complication rates have been observed: 4.8% for leadless pacemakers versus 4.1% for conventional pacemakers. The complication rate of the leadless pacemakers is influenced by the implanter learning curve for this new procedure. No long-term outcome data are yet available for the leadless pacemakers. Larger leadless pacing trials, with long-term follow-up and direct randomized comparison with conventional pacing systems, will be required to define the proper clinical role of these leadless systems. Although current leadless pacemakers are limited to right ventricular pacing, future advanced, communicating, multicomponent systems are expected to expand the potential benefits of leadless therapy to a larger patient population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.116.025037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Micra TPS provides a way to manage patients who are otherwise poor candidates for transvenous systems.

    “The Micra TPS®, the first commercially available transcatheter pacemaker in the US, provides a way to manage patients who are otherwise poor candidates for transvenous systems [41] .”

    From Evaluating and managing bradycardia (2020) · cites this paper as [41]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 228

Authors
Tjong, F. V. Y., & Reddy, V. Y.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2017-04-11
Volume
135
Issue
15
Pages
1458-1470
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2606974277
Cited by
228
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 9
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
leadless pacemaker, right ventricular pacing, single-chamber pacing, lead complications, cardiac perforation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Clinical Trials as Topic, Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review