Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review
Open accessAbstract
A new technology, leadless pacemaker therapy, was recently introduced clinically to address lead- and pocket-related complications in conventional transvenous pacemaker therapy. These leadless devices are self-contained right ventricular single-chamber pacemakers implanted by using a femoral percutaneous approach. In this review of available clinical data on leadless pacemakers, early results with leadless devices are compared with historical results with conventional single-chamber pacing. Both presently manufactured leadless pacemakers show similar complications, which are mostly related to the implant procedure: cardiac perforation, device dislocation, and femoral vascular access site complications. In comparison with conventional transvenous single-chamber pacemakers, slightly higher short-term complication rates have been observed: 4.8% for leadless pacemakers versus 4.1% for conventional pacemakers. The complication rate of the leadless pacemakers is influenced by the implanter learning curve for this new procedure. No long-term outcome data are yet available for the leadless pacemakers. Larger leadless pacing trials, with long-term follow-up and direct randomized comparison with conventional pacing systems, will be required to define the proper clinical role of these leadless systems. Although current leadless pacemakers are limited to right ventricular pacing, future advanced, communicating, multicomponent systems are expected to expand the potential benefits of leadless therapy to a larger patient population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Micra TPS provides a way to manage patients who are otherwise poor candidates for transvenous systems.
“The Micra TPS®, the first commercially available transcatheter pacemaker in the US, provides a way to manage patients who are otherwise poor candidates for transvenous systems [41] .”
From Evaluating and managing bradycardia (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Tjong, F. V. Y., & Reddy, V. Y.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2017-04-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1458-1470
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2606974277
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-07-18)
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- leadless pacemaker, right ventricular pacing, single-chamber pacing, lead complications, cardiac perforation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- MeSH terms
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Clinical Trials as Topic, Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review