Cited by 291Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Myocardial Gene Expression Signatures in Human Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Open access
Hahn, Virginia S., Knutsdottir, Hildur, Luo, Xin, Bedi, Kenneth, Margulies, Kenneth B., Haldar, Saptarsi M., Stolina, Marina, Yin, Jun +5 more·2021·Circulation

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes half of all HF but lacks effective therapy. Understanding of its myocardial biology remains limited because of a paucity of heart tissue molecular analysis. Methods: We performed RNA sequencing on right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsies prospectively obtained from patients meeting consensus criteria for HFpEF (n=41) contrasted with right ventricular septal tissue from patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n=30) and donor controls (n=24). Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering tested for transcriptomic distinctiveness between groups, effect of comorbidities, and differential gene expression with pathway enrichment contrasted HF groups and donor controls. Within HFpEF, non–negative matrix factorization and weighted gene coexpression analysis identified molecular subgroups, and the resulting clusters were correlated with hemodynamic and clinical data. Results: Patients with HFpEF were more often women (59%), African American (68%), obese (median body mass index 41), and hypertensive (98%), with clinical HF characterized by 65% New York Heart Association Class III or IV, nearly all on a loop diuretic, and 70% with a HF hospitalization in the previous year. Principal component analysis separated HFpEF from HFrEF and donor controls with minimal overlap, and this persisted after adjusting for primary comorbidities: body mass index, sex, age, diabetes, and renal function. Hierarchical clustering confirmed group separation. Nearly half the significantly altered genes in HFpEF versus donor controls (1882 up, 2593 down) changed in the same direction in HFrEF; however, 5745 genes were uniquely altered between HF groups. Compared with controls, uniquely upregulated genes in HFpEF were enriched in mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate synthesis/electron transport, pathways downregulated in HFrEF. HFpEF-specific downregulated genes engaged endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, and angiogenesis. Body mass index differences largely accounted for HFpEF upregulated genes, whereas neither this nor broader comorbidity adjustment altered pathways enriched in downregulated genes. Non–negative matrix factorization identified 3 HFpEF transcriptomic subgroups with distinctive pathways and clinical correlates, including a group closest to HFrEF with higher mortality, and a mostly female group with smaller hearts and proinflammatory signaling. These groupings remained after sex adjustment. Weighted gene coexpression analysis yielded analogous gene clusters and clinical groupings. Conclusions: HFpEF exhibits distinctive broad transcriptomic signatures and molecular subgroupings with particular clinical features and outcomes. The data reveal new signaling targets to consider for precision therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.120.050498

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis are markedly prevalent in patients with HFpEF, as confirmed in a large, prospective analysis of HFpEF myocardial tissue.

    “Two pathological characteristics markedly prevalent in patients with HFpEF are cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis, as confirmed in a large, prospective analysis of HFpEF myocardial tissue.8,9”

    From Reversal of contractile defects by mediating calcium homeostasis in human mini-heart models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) leads to first-in-human gene therapy clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Methods (Myocardial Tissue Procurement and Processing; page unavailable) describe biopsies from 63 HFpEF patients and histological assessment of myocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis. The Discussion (HFpEF transcriptomic signatures and the role of co-morbidities; page unavailable) says related pathways were more engaged than in controls. These passages support the study’s relevance, but do not establish that both pathological findings were markedly prevalent in the patients’ tissue. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SERCA2a (ATP2A2) is downregulated in HFpEF patients and in engineered HFpEF-hvCTS and HFpEF-hvCOC mini-heart models compared to respective controls.

    “The SERCA2a (ATP2A2) DEG was downregulated in HFpEF patients and in engineered HFpEF-hvCTS and HFpEF-hvCOC mini-heart models compared to respective controls.”

    From Reversal of contractile defects by mediating calcium homeostasis in human mini-heart models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) leads to first-in-human gene therapy clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results section reports many genes downregulated in HFpEF patients versus controls, but the passages in our copy do not identify SERCA2a (ATP2A2) as one of them. Searches for SERCA2a, ATP2A2, HFpEF-hvCTS, and HFpEF-hvCOC found no passage establishing the gene’s expression in patients or the engineered models; the paper’s Methods describe patient biopsies rather than those models. No page numbers were available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 291

Authors
Hahn, V. S., Knutsdottir, H., Luo, X., Bedi, K., Margulies, K. B., Haldar, S. M., Stolina, M., Yin, J., Khakoo, A. Y., Vaishnav, J., Bader, J. S., Kass, D. A., & Sharma, K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (H.K., J.S.B., D.A.K.).
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kass, David A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2021-01-12
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
120-134
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W3095646911
Cited by
291
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 2
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (16SFRN27870000, 16SFRN28620000)
  • Amgen
  • Sanofi
  • Johns Hopkins University (16SFRN27870000)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL61912, R35HL135827, R01HL061912, HL135827, T32HL007227, R01HL124091)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, myocardial transcriptome, endomyocardial biopsy, molecular subtypes, mitochondrial ATP production, electron transport, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, angiogenesis, body mass index, sex differences, pro-inflammatory signaling, mortality, obesity, hypertension, gene expression signatures, gene co-expression
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardium, Prospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review