Cited by 21Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

High-Volume Physical Activity and Clinical Coronary Artery Disease Outcomes: Findings From the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study

Berry, Jarett D., Zabad, Noor, Kyrouac, Douglas, Leonard, David, Barlow, Carolyn E., Pavlovic, Andjelka, Shuval, Kerem, Levine, Benjamin D. +1 more·2025·Circulation

Abstract

Background High-volume physical activity (PA) is associated with a higher prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the clinical significance of subclinical CAD among high-volume exercisers remains incompletely understood, and the dose-response relationship between high-volume PA and clinical CAD events remains uncertain. Methods Individual participant data from the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study (1987-2018) were linked to Medicare claims files. PA volume was determined by self-report and categorized as Results We included 26 724 participants (54 years of age; 28% women). Mean exercise volume was 1130 MET-minutes per week, with 1997 (7.5%) reporting ≥3000 MET-minutes per week. After a mean follow-up of 20.5 years, we observed 811 acute myocardial infarction events, 1636 composite CAD events, and 2857 deaths without CAD. Compared with individuals exercising 3000 MET-minutes per week) and risk for acute myocardial infarction (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.72-1.25]). In contrast, the lowest risk for death was observed among the high-volume PA group (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60-0.83]). CAC (on log scale) was associated with a higher risk for composite CAD across all PA categories, including among the high-volume PA subgroup (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.16-1.44]; P P interaction = 0.969). Conclusions Compared with low-volume PA, high-volume PA was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality but a similar risk for clinical CAD. CAC was associated with an increased risk…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.124.070335

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berry, J. D., Zabad, N., Kyrouac, D., Leonard, D., Barlow, C. E., Pavlovic, A., Shuval, K., Levine, B. D., & DeFina, L. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Tyler (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Cooper Institute (US)
  • Texas Health Dallas (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2025-05-06
Volume
151
Issue
18
Pages
1299-1308
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4409621970
Cited by
21
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
coronary artery disease, subclinical coronary artery disease, coronary artery calcium, acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, all-cause mortality, dose-response relationship, exercise volume, Cooper Center Longitudinal Study, Medicare claims data
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Medicare, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, United States, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review