Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Non-Randomized Database Analyses to Complement Randomized Clinical Trials: Promising Approaches for Cardiovascular Medicine

Schneeweiss, Sebastian, Krüger, Nils·2025·Circulation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.125.073235

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This enabled benchmarking against existing trial evidence, highlighting the validity of outcome capture in claims data, and allowed for confident expansion to populations more representative of patients treated in clinical practice.

    “This enabled benchmarking against existing trial evidence, highlighting the validity of outcome capture in claims data, and allowed for confident expansion to populations more representative of patients treated in clinical practice.14,16”
  • This study exemplifies how real-world evidence can meaningfully complement randomized trials through structured and rigorous analyses.

    “This study also exemplifies how real-world evidence can meaningfully complement randomized trials through structured and rigorous analyses.13-16”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064645 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.2023.4221 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/cpt.3364 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/pds.5715 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/cpt.3621 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schneeweiss, S., & Krüger, N.
Affiliations
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA (S.S., N.K.).
Venue
Circulation
Published
2025-05-27
Volume
151
Issue
21
Pages
1495-1497
ISSN
  • 0009-7322
  • 1524-4539
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review