The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
Background — The pulmonary veins (PVs) have been demonstrated to often play an important role in generating atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of segmental PV isolation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Methods and Results — In 70 consecutive patients (mean age, 53±11 years) with paroxysmal (58) or persistent (12) AF, segmental PV isolation guided by ostial PV potentials was performed. The left superior, left inferior, and right superior PVs were targeted for isolation in all patients, and the right inferior PV was isolated in 20 patients. Among the 230 targeted PVs, 217 (94%) were completely isolated, with a mean of 6.5±4.2 minutes of radiofrequency energy applied at a maximum power setting of 35 W. A second PV isolation procedure was performed in 6 patients (9%). At 5 months of follow-up, 70% of patients with paroxysmal and 22% of patients with persistent AF were free from recurrent AF ( P <0.001), and 83% of patients with paroxysmal AF were either free of symptomatic AF or had significant improvement. Among various clinical characteristics, only paroxysmal AF was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrence of AF ( P <0.05). One patient developed unilateral quadrantopsia after the procedure. There were no other complications. Conclusions — With a segmental isolation approach that targets at least 3 PVs, a clinically satisfactory result can be achieved in >80% of patients with paroxysmal AF. The clinical efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation is much lower when AF is persistent than when it is paroxysmal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021328 · Cited by 4,405
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S.-A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., Kim, Y.-H., Klein, G., Natale, A., Packer, D., et al. (2010) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.109.859116 · Cited by 2,852
The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction
Widlansky, M. E., Gokce, N., Keaney, J. F., & Vita, J. A. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00994-x · Cited by 1,749
Wazni, O. M., Marrouche, N. F., Martin, D. O., Verma, A., Bhargava, M., Saliba, W., Bash, D., Schweikert, R., Brachmann, J., Gunther, J., et al. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.21.2634 · Cited by 1,121
Calkins, H., Reynolds, M. R., Spector, P., Sondhi, M., Xu, Y., Martin, A., Williams, C. J., & Sledge, I. (2009) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.108.824789 · Cited by 847
Metadata
- Authors
- Oral, H., Knight, B. P., Tada, H., Özaydın, M., Chugh, A., Hassan, S., Scharf, C., Lai, S. W. K., Greenstein, R., Pelosi, F., Strickberger, S. A., & Morady, F.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-03-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1077-1081
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2122843638
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc0902.104712
- The paper
- Oral, H., Knight, B. P., Tada, H., Özaydın, M., Chugh, A., Hassan, S., Scharf, C., Lai, S. W. K., Greenstein, R., Pelosi, F., Strickberger, S. A., & Morady, F. (2002). Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0902.104712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.