The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Plaques Predict Future Strokes
Open accessAbstract
Background —We tested prospectively the hypothesis that stroke development can be predicted by echolucency of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in previously symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Methods and Results —We followed incidence of ipsilateral ischemic strokes for 4.4 years in 111 asymptomatic and 135 symptomatic patients with ≥50% relevant carotid artery stenosis. At inclusion, echogenicity of carotid plaques and degree of stenosis were evaluated with high-resolution B-mode ultrasound with computer-assisted image processing and Doppler ultrasound, respectively. We observed 44 ipsilateral ischemic strokes. In symptomatic patients, relative risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke for echolucent versus echorich plaques was 3.1 (95% CI, 1.3 to 7.3), whereas for 80% to 99% versus 50% to 79% stenosis, the relative risk was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.0). Relative to symptomatic patients with echorich 50% to 79% stenotic plaques, those with echorich 80% to 99% stenotic plaques, echolucent 50% to 79% stenotic plaques, and echolucent 80% to 99% stenotic plaques had relative risks of ipsilateral ischemic strokes of 3.1 (95%CI, 0.7 to 14), 4.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 15), and 7.9 (95% CI, 2.1 to 30), equivalent to absolute risk increases of 11%, 18%, and 28%. This was not observed in previously asymptomatic patients. Conclusions —Echolucent plaques causing ≥50% diameter stenosis by Doppler ultrasound are associated with risk of future stroke in symptomatic but not asymptomatic individuals. This suggests that measurement of echolucency, together with degree of stenosis, may improve selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., Bittl, J. A., Bridges, C. R., Byrne, J. G., Cigarroa, J. E., DiSesa, V. J., Hiratzka, L. F., Hutter, A. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009 · Cited by 820
Wolff, B., Völzke, H., Lüdemann, J., Robinson, D., Vogelgesang, D., Staudt, A., Kessler, C., Dahm, J. B., John, U., & Felix, S. B. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000114875.31599.1c · Cited by 108
Plaque composition in the proximal superficial femoral artery and peripheral artery disease events
McDermott, M. M., Kramer, C. M., Tian, L., Carr, J., Guralnik, J. M., Polonsky, T., Carroll, T., Kibbe, M., Criqui, M. H., Ferrucci, L., et al. (2017) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.012 · Cited by 55
Thornhill, R. E., Lum, C., Jaberi, A., Stefanski, P., Torres, C. H., Momoli, F., Petrcich, W., & Dowlatshahi, D. (2014) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.011 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Grønholdt, M.-L. M., Nordestgaard, B. G., Schroeder, T. V., Vorstrup, S., & Sillesen, H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-07-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-73
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1986996455
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Plaques Predict Future Strokes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc2601.091704
- The paper
- Grønholdt, M.-L. M., Nordestgaard, B. G., Schroeder, T. V., Vorstrup, S., & Sillesen, H. (2001). Ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Plaques Predict Future Strokes. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc2601.091704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.