Novel MRI Contrast Agent for Molecular Imaging of Fibrin: Implications for Detecting Vulnerable Plaques
Abstract
Background Molecular imaging of thrombus within fissures of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques requires sensitive detection of a robust thrombus-specific contrast agent. In this study, we report the development and characterization of a novel ligand-targeted paramagnetic molecular imaging agent with high avidity for fibrin and the potential to sensitively detect active vulnerable plaques. Methods and Results The nanoparticles were formulated with 2.5 to 50 mol% Gd-DTPA-BOA, which corresponds to >50 000 Gd 3+ atoms/particle. Paramagnetic nanoparticles were characterized in vitro and evaluated in vivo. In contradistinction to traditional blood-pool agents, T1 relaxation rate as a function of paramagnetic nanoparticle number was increased monotonically with Gd-DTPA concentration from 0.18 mL · s −1 · pmol −1 (10% Gd-DTPA nanoparticles) to 0.54 mL · s −1 · pmol −1 for the 40 mol% Gd-DTPA formulations. Fibrin clots targeted in vitro with paramagnetic nanoparticles presented a highly detectable, homogeneous T1-weighted contrast enhancement that improved with increasing gadolinium level (0, 2.5, and 20 mol% Gd). Higher-resolution scans and scanning electron microscopy revealed that the nanoparticles were present as a thin layer over the clot surface. In vivo contrast enhancement under open-circulation conditions was assessed in dogs. The contrast-to-noise ratio between the targeted clot (20 mol% Gd-DTPA nanoparticles) and blood was ≈118±21, and that between the targeted clot and the control clot was 131±37. Conclusions These results suggest that molecular imaging of fibrin-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles can provide sensitive detection and localization of fibrin and may allow early, direct identification of vulnerable plaques, leading to early therapeutic decisions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fibrin-targeted paramagnetic nanoemulsions detect thrombi in fissures of vulnerable plaques.
“These include fibrin-targeted paramagnetic nanoemulsions that detect thrombi in fissures of vulnerable plaques132”
From Perspectives and opportunities for nanomedicine in the management of atherosclerosis (2011) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 515
- Authors
- Flacke, S., Fischer, S., Scott, M. J., Fuhrhop, R. J., Allen, J. S., McLean, M., Winter, P., Sicard, G. A., Gaffney, P. J., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M.
- Affiliations
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-09-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1280-1285
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2138131118
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 59865, R01HL059865)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- paramagnetic nanoparticles, thrombus detection, vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque, T1 relaxation rate, gadolinium concentration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arteriosclerosis, Contrast Media, Dogs, Fibrin, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Image Enhancement, Jugular Veins, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Particle Size, Thrombosis, Biotinylation, Venous Thrombosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review