The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State
Abstract
Background An inverse relation exists between the number of coronary angioplasty procedures performed by physicians or hospitals and short-term mortality. It is not known, however, whether a similar relation holds for physicians and hospitals that perform primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results We analyzed data from the 1995 New York State Coronary Angioplasty Reporting System Registry to determine the relation between the number of primary angioplasty procedures performed by physicians and hospitals and in-hospital mortality. Patients who underwent angioplasty procedures within 23 hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction without preceding thrombolytic therapy were included (n=1342). In-hospital mortality was reduced 57% among patients who underwent primary angioplasty by high-volume as opposed to low-volume physicians (adjusted relative risk 0.43; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83). When patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with primary angioplasty in high-volume hospitals rather than low-volume institutions, the relative risk reduction for in-hospital mortality was 44% (adjusted relative risk 0.56; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.1). Compared with patients treated at low-volume hospitals by low-volume physicians, patients treated at high-volume hospitals by high-volume physicians had a 49% reduction in the risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted relative risk 0.51; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.99). Conclusions Among hospitals in New York State, a higher volume of primary angioplasty procedures performed by physicians and/or hospitals was associated with a lower mortality rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 · Cited by 7,167
Writing Committee Members, Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., Bailey, S. R., Bittl, J. A., Cercek, B., Chambers, C. E., Ellis, S. G., Guyton, R. A., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31823ba622 · Cited by 3,289
Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Authors/Task Force Members, Wijns, W., Kolh, P., Danchin, N., Di Mario, C., Falk, V., Folliguet, T., Garg, S., Huber, K., et al. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277 · Cited by 3,184
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijy19m01_01 · Cited by 1,259
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Sousa-Uva, M., Neumann, F.-J., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy289 · Cited by 989
Metadata
- Authors
- Vakili, B. A., Kaplan, R., & Brown, D. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-10-30
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2171-2176
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2124523659
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc3901.096668
- The paper
- Vakili, B. A., Kaplan, R., & Brown, D. L. (2001). Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc3901.096668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.