The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up
Open accessAbstract
Background We have previously reported a virtual absence of neointimal hyperplasia 4 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether these results are sustained over a period of 1 year. Methods and Results Forty-five patients with de novo coronary disease were successfully treated with the implantation of a single sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent in São Paulo, Brazil (n=30, 15 fast release [group I, GI] and 15 slow release [GII]) and Rotterdam, The Netherlands (15 slow release, GIII). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was obtained at 4 and 12 months (GI and GII) and 6 months (GIII). In-stent minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis remained essentially unchanged in all groups (at 12 months, GI and GII; at 6 months, GIII). Follow-up in-lesion minimal lumen diameter was 2.28 mm (GIII), 2.32 mm (GI), and 2.48 mm (GII). No patient approached the ≥50% diameter stenosis at 1 year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed. Neointimal hyperplasia, as detected by IVUS, was virtually absent at 6 months (2±5% obstruction volume, GIII) and at 12 months (GI=2±5% and GII=2±3%). Conclusions This study demonstrates a sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents 1 year after implantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inhibition of the mTORC Pathway in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Canaud, G., Bienaimé, F., Tabarin, F., Bataillon, G., Seilhean, D., Noël, L.-H., Dragon-Durey, M.-A., Snanoudj, R., Friedlander, G., Halbwachs-Mecarelli, L., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1312890 · Cited by 355
Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue
Panyam, J., & Labhasetwar, V. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.023 · Cited by 270
Redox regulation of the nutrient-sensitive raptor-mTOR pathway and complex
Sarbassov, D. D., & Sabatini, D. M. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m506096200 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa, J. E., Costa, M. A., Abizaid, A. C., Rensing, B. J., Abizaid, A. S., Tanajura, L. F., Kozuma, K., Van Langenhove, G., Sousa, A. G. M. R., Falotico, R., Jaeger, J., Popma, J. J., & Serruys, P. W.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-10-23
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2007-2011
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2163780498
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 83.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc4201.098056
- The paper
- Sousa, J. E., Costa, M. A., Abizaid, A. C., Rensing, B. J., Abizaid, A. S., Tanajura, L. F., Kozuma, K., Van Langenhove, G., Sousa, A. G. M. R., Falotico, R., Jaeger, J., Popma, J. J., & Serruys, P. W. (2001). Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.098056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.