Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up

Open access
Sousa, J. Eduardo, Costa, Marco A., Abizaid, Alexandre C., Rensing, Benno J., Abizaid, Andrea S., Tanajura, Luiz F., Kozuma, Ken, Van Langenhove, Glenn, Sousa, Amanda G.M.R., Falotico, Robert, Jaeger, Judith, Popma, Jeffrey J., Serruys, Patrick W.·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background We have previously reported a virtual absence of neointimal hyperplasia 4 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether these results are sustained over a period of 1 year. Methods and Results Forty-five patients with de novo coronary disease were successfully treated with the implantation of a single sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent in São Paulo, Brazil (n=30, 15 fast release [group I, GI] and 15 slow release [GII]) and Rotterdam, The Netherlands (15 slow release, GIII). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was obtained at 4 and 12 months (GI and GII) and 6 months (GIII). In-stent minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis remained essentially unchanged in all groups (at 12 months, GI and GII; at 6 months, GIII). Follow-up in-lesion minimal lumen diameter was 2.28 mm (GIII), 2.32 mm (GI), and 2.48 mm (GII). No patient approached the ≥50% diameter stenosis at 1 year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed. Neointimal hyperplasia, as detected by IVUS, was virtually absent at 6 months (2±5% obstruction volume, GIII) and at 12 months (GI=2±5% and GII=2±3%). Conclusions This study demonstrates a sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents 1 year after implantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc4201.098056

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Sousa, J. E., Costa, M. A., Abizaid, A. C., Rensing, B. J., Abizaid, A. S., Tanajura, L. F., Kozuma, K., Van Langenhove, G., Sousa, A. G. M. R., Falotico, R., Jaeger, J., Popma, J. J., & Serruys, P. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-10-23
Volume
104
Issue
17
Pages
2007-2011
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2163780498
Cited by
672
References
0
FWCI
83.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc4201.098056
The paper
Sousa, J. E., Costa, M. A., Abizaid, A. C., Rensing, B. J., Abizaid, A. S., Tanajura, L. F., Kozuma, K., Van Langenhove, G., Sousa, A. G. M. R., Falotico, R., Jaeger, J., Popma, J. J., & Serruys, P. W. (2001). Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: One-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.098056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.