Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 863

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrial Electroanatomic Remodeling After Circumferential Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Efficacy of an Anatomic Approach in a Large Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Pappone, Carlo, Oreto, Giuseppe, Rosanio, Salvatore, Vicedomini, Gabriele, Tocchi, Monica, Gugliotta, Filippo, Salvati, Adriano, Dicandia, Cosimo, Calabrò, Maria Pia, Mazzone, Patrizio, Ficarra, Eleonora, Di Gioia, Claudio, Gulletta, Simone, Nardi, Stefano, Santinelli, Vincenzo, Benussi, Stefano, Alfieri, Ottavio·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background Circumferential radiofrequency ablation around pulmonary vein (PV) ostia has recently been described as a new anatomic approach for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results We treated 251 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (n=179) or permanent (n=72) AF. Circular PV lesions were deployed transseptally during sinus rhythm (n=124) or AF (n=127) using 3D electroanatomic guidance. Procedures lasted 148±26 minutes. Among 980 lesions surrounding individual PVs (n=956) or 2 ipsilateral veins with close openings or common ostium (n=24), 75% were defined as complete by a bipolar electrogram amplitude <0.1 mV inside the lesion and a delay >30 ms across the line. The amount of low-voltage encircled area was 3594±449 mm 2 , which accounted for 23±9% of the total left atrial (LA) map surface. Major complications (cardiac tamponade) occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). No PV stenoses were detected by transesophageal echocardiography. After 10.4±4.5 months, 152 patients with paroxysmal AF (85%) and 49 with permanent AF (68%) were AF-free. Patients with and without AF recurrence did not differ in age, AF duration, prevalence of heart disease, or ejection fraction, but the LA diameter was significantly higher ( P <0.001) in permanent AF patients with recurrence. The proportion of PVs with complete lesions was similar between patients with and without recurrence, but the latter had larger low-voltage encircled areas after radiofrequency (expressed as percent of LA surface area; P <0.001). Conclusions Circumferential PV ablation is a safe and effective treatment for AF. Its success is likely due to both PV trigger isolation and electroanatomic remodeling of the area encompassing the PV ostia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc4601.098517

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 863

Metadata

Authors
Pappone, C., Oreto, G., Rosanio, S., Vicedomini, G., Tocchi, M., Gugliotta, F., Salvati, A., Dicandia, C., Calabrò, M. P., Mazzone, P., Ficarra, E., Di Gioia, C., Gulletta, S., Nardi, S., Santinelli, V., Benussi, S., & Alfieri, O.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-11-20
Volume
104
Issue
21
Pages
2539-2544
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2749910342
Cited by
863
References
1
FWCI
41.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrial Electroanatomic Remodeling After Circumferential Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Efficacy of an Anatomic Approach in a Large Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc4601.098517
The paper
Pappone, C., Oreto, G., Rosanio, S., Vicedomini, G., Tocchi, M., Gugliotta, F., Salvati, A., Dicandia, C., Calabrò, M. P., Mazzone, P., Ficarra, E., Di Gioia, C., Gulletta, S., Nardi, S., Santinelli, V., Benussi, S., & Alfieri, O. (2001). Atrial Electroanatomic Remodeling After Circumferential Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Efficacy of an Anatomic Approach in a Large Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4601.098517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.