The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival in Cardiac Arrest
Abstract
Background— Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and dispatcher-delivered instruction in CPR can increase the proportion of arrest victims who receive bystander CPR before emergency medical service (EMS) arrival. However, little is known about the survival effectiveness of dispatcher-delivered telephone CPR instruction. Methods and Results We evaluated a population-based cohort of EMS-attended adult cardiac arrests (n=7265) from 1983 through 2000 in King County, Washington, to assess the association between survival to hospital discharge and 3 distinct CPR groups: no bystander CPR before EMS arrival (no bystander CPR), bystander CPR before EMS arrival requiring dispatcher instruction (dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR), and bystander CPR before EMS arrival not requiring dispatcher instruction (bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance). In this cohort, 44.1% received no bystander CPR before EMS arrival, 25.7% received dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR, and 30.2% received bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance. Overall survival was 15.3%. Using no bystander CPR as the reference group, the multivariate adjusted odds ratio of survival was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 1.73) for dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.01) for bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance. Conclusion Dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR seems to increase survival in cardiac arrest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zipes, D. P., & Wellens, H. J. J. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.21.2334 · Cited by 2,744
Cited by
Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sasson, C., Rogers, M. A. M., Dahl, J., & Kellermann, A. L. (2010) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.889576 · Cited by 2,064
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., Greif, R., Maconochie, I. K., Nikolaou, N. I., Perkins, G. D., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Wyllie, J., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 · Cited by 915
Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe
Atwood, C., Eisenberg, M. S., Herlitz, J., & Rea, T. D. (2005) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.03.021 · Cited by 849
Self-citationOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest: current concepts
Myat, A., Song, K.-J., & Rea, T. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30472-0 · Cited by 566
Self-citationKiguchi, T., Okubo, M., Nishiyama, C., Maconochie, I., Ong, M. E. H., Kern, K. B., Wyckoff, M. H., McNally, B., Christensen, E. F., Tjelmeland, I., et al. (2020) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.044 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Rea, T. D., Eisenberg, M. S., Culley, L. L., & Becker, L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-11-20
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2513-2516
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1992994175
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival in Cardiac Arrest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc4601.099468
- The paper
- Rea, T. D., Eisenberg, M. S., Culley, L. L., & Becker, L. (2001). Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival in Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4601.099468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.