The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and Imaging Findings in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With and Without Patent Foramen Ovale: The PFO-ASA Study
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose — Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been identified as a potential risk factor for stroke, but the mechanisms of PFO-associated stroke remain unsettled. The aim of our study was to evaluate possible differences in stroke risk factors and stroke patterns between patients with and without PFO that may give clues to the mechanism of PFO-associated stroke. Methods — This prospective, multicentric study involved 581 young cryptogenic stroke patients. The presence of PFO and atrial septal aneurysm was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and reviewed independently by 2 experienced sonographers. Clinical, brain, and vascular imaging findings were reviewed by 2 neurologists and 2 neuroradiologists. Results — Of the 581 stroke patients, 267 (45.9%) had PFO. Patients with PFO were younger (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97) and less likely to have traditional risk factors such as hypertension (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.85), hypercholesterolemia (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.93), or current smoking (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97). Features suggestive of paradoxical embolism, such as Valsalva-provoking activities or deep vein thrombosis, were not more frequent in patients with PFO. Migraine was more common in patients with PFO (27.3%) than in those without PFO (14.0%). PFO (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.82), particularly when associated with atrial septal aneurysm (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.36 to 5.41), was significantly associated with migraine after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions — Differences in stroke risk factors and stroke patterns suggest that different stroke mechanisms occur in patients with and without PFO. PFO is significantly and independently associated with migraine, and this association is even stronger in patients with PFO and atrial septal aneurysm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
Cited by
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
MacClellan, L. R., Giles, W., Cole, J., Wozniak, M., Stern, B., Mitchell, B. D., & Kittner, S. J. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.488395 · Cited by 339
Early and late seizures after cryptogenic ischemic stroke in young adults
Lamy, C., Domigo, V., Semah, F., Arquizan, C., Trystram, D., Coste, J., & Mas, J. L. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.60.3.400 · Cited by 275
Self-citationContemporary Management of Patent Foramen Ovale
Meier, B., & Lock, J. E. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000046073.34261.c1 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamy, C., Giannesini, C., Zuber, M., Arquizan, C., Meder, J. F., Trystram, D., Coste, J., & Mas, J. L.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 706-711
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2096629412
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Imaging Findings in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With and Without Patent Foramen Ovale: The PFO-ASA Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hs0302.104543
- The paper
- Lamy, C., Giannesini, C., Zuber, M., Arquizan, C., Meder, J. F., Trystram, D., Coste, J., & Mas, J. L. (2002). Clinical and Imaging Findings in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With and Without Patent Foramen Ovale: The PFO-ASA Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0302.104543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.