The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Survival and Causes of Death After Stroke
Abstract
Background and Purpose — As part of the Danish contribution to the World Health Organization (WHO) MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Project, a register of patients with stroke was established in 1982. The purpose of the present study was to analyze long-term survival and causes of death after a first stroke and to compare them with those of the background population. Methods — The study population comprised all subjects aged 25 years or older who were resident in a geographically defined region in Copenhagen County. All stroke events in the study population during 1982–1991 were ascertained and validated according to standardized criteria outlined for the WHO MONICA Project. After completion of the stroke registry at the end of 1991, all patients were followed up by record linkage to official registries. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated for various causes of death and periods after the stroke. Results — The estimated cumulative risks for death at 28 days, 1 year, and 5 years after onset were 28%, 41%, and 60%, respectively. Compared with the general population, nonfatal stroke was associated with an almost 5-fold increase in risk for death between 4 weeks and 1 year after a first stroke and a 2-fold increase in the risk for death subsequent to 1 year. The excess mortality rate in stroke patients was due mainly to cardiovascular diseases but also to cancer, other diseases, accidents, and suicide. The probability for long-term survival improved significantly during the observation period for patients with ischemic or ill-defined stroke. Conclusions — Stroke is a medical emergency associated with a very high risk for death in the acute and subacute phases and with a continuous excess risk of death. Better prevention and management of strokes may improve the long-term survival rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brugts, J. J., Yetgin, T., Hoeks, S. E., Gotto, A. M., Shepherd, J., Westendorp, R. G. J., de Craen, A. J. M., Knopp, R. H., Nakamura, H., Ridker, P., et al. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2376 · Cited by 792
Lovibond, K., Jowett, S., Barton, P., Caulfield, M., Heneghan, C., Hobbs, F. R., Hodgkinson, J., Mant, J., Martin, U., Williams, B., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61184-7 · Cited by 311
Recurrent stroke and cardiac risks after first ischemic stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study
Dhamoon, M. S., Sciacca, R. R., Rundek, T., Sacco, R. L., & Elkind, M. S. V. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000201253.93811.f6 · Cited by 307
Prevalence of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance Following a Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke
Kernan, W. N. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.2.227 · Cited by 127
Arends, C. M., Liman, T. G., Strzelecka, P. M., Kufner, A., Löwe, P., Huo, S., Stein, C. M., Piper, S. K., Tilgner, M., Sperber, P. S., et al. (2023) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022017661 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Brønnum-Hansen, H., Davidsen, M., & Thorvaldsen, P.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2131-2136
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2014757808
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Survival and Causes of Death After Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hs0901.094253
- The paper
- Brønnum-Hansen, H., Davidsen, M., & Thorvaldsen, P. (2001). Long-Term Survival and Causes of Death After Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0901.094253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.